Ad is loading...
87 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
DIVZ vs OWL
DIVZ vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts DIVZ vs OWL
Opal Dividend Income ETF
Price$33.41
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
Volume$33.68K
CapitalizationN/A
Blue Owl Capital
Price$22.59
Change-$0.12 (-0.53%)
Volume$3.72M
CapitalizationN/A
DIVZ vs OWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIVZ vs. OWL commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIVZ is a Buy and OWL is a Sell.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DIVZ | OWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FNDF | 34.72 | 0.06 | +0.17% |
| Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF | |||
| ROKT | 54.74 | -0.05 | -0.09% |
| SPDR® Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | |||
| TBUX | 49.72 | -0.06 | -0.13% |
| T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | |||
| XHS | 91.60 | -1.59 | -1.70% |
| SPDR® S&P Health Care Services ETF | |||
| IHAK | 48.81 | -0.96 | -1.93% |
| iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF | |||
DIVZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIVZ has been loosely correlated with OWL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIVZ jumps, then OWL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DIVZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIVZ | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| OWL - DIVZ | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| KVUE - DIVZ | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| USB - DIVZ | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.81% | ||
| MS - DIVZ | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| D - DIVZ | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.56% | ||
More | ||||
OWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been loosely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OWL | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| APO - OWL | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| ARES - OWL | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| TPG - OWL | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| STEP - OWL | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| KKR - OWL | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||