Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. DLHCX (636M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than DLHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs DLHCX (0.00). DLHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLHCX (16 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). DLHCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. DLHCX (5.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHCX: FSPHX (0) vs DLHCX (1000). FSPHX (-16.64) and DLHCX (-17.02) have marching annual gain over last year. DLHCX (-14.58) and FSPHX (-14.93) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DLHCX | FSPHX | DLHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.63 | 311% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.63 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.908 | -3.560 | -110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 636M | 5.88B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.02 | -16.64 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.45 | 1.92 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.58 | -14.93 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.35 | 34.45 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement