Ad is loading...
DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. DLHCX (647M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than DLHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs DLHCX (0.00). DLHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLHCX (15 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). DLHCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. DLHCX (5.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHCX: FSPHX (0) vs DLHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.70 vs. DLHCX (-15.32). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -9.48 vs. DLHCX (-17.76).
| DLHCX | FSPHX | DLHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.65 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.65 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.958 | -8.257 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 647M | 6.42B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.32 | -10.70 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.87 | -11.68 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.76 | -9.48 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.89 | 5.32 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers