Ad is loading...
DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.2B vs. DLHCX (655M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than DLHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs DLHCX (0.00). DLHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLHCX (15 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). DLHCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. DLHCX (5.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHCX: FSPHX (0) vs DLHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.31 vs. DLHCX (-18.15). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -11.47 vs. DLHCX (-19.69).
| DLHCX | FSPHX | DLHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.63 | 311% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.63 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.766 | -7.229 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 655M | 6.2B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.15 | -11.31 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.12 | 5.18 | -215% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.69 | -11.47 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.27 | 8.19 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...