Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. DLHCX (658M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than DLHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs DLHCX (0.00). DLHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLHCX (15 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). DLHCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. DLHCX (5.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHCX: FSPHX (0) vs DLHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.08 vs. DLHCX (-16.50). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.63 vs. DLHCX (-18.00).
| DLHCX | FSPHX | DLHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.63 | 311% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.63 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.050 | -6.642 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 658M | 5.86B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.50 | -12.08 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.78 | 9.39 | -62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.00 | -10.63 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.03 | 8.01 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement