Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. DLHCX (704M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than DLHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs DLHCX (0.00). DLHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLHCX (16 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). DLHCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. DLHCX (5.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHCX: FSPHX (0) vs DLHCX (1000). DLHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.04 vs. FSPHX (0.02). DLHCX return over 5 years is better than : -6.93 vs. FSPHX (-8.84).
| DLHCX | FSPHX | DLHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.63 | 311% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.63 | 319% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.064 | 10.532 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 704M | 6.22B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | 0.02 | 12,043% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.81 | 10.47 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.93 | -8.84 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.08 | 39.34 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement