Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. DLHCX (708M). DLHCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: DLHCX (1.92) vs FSPHX (0.45). DLHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLHCX (16 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). DLHCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. DLHCX (5.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHCX: FSPHX (0) vs DLHCX (1000). DLHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.00 vs. FSPHX (0.76). DLHCX return over 5 years is better than : -15.27 vs. FSPHX (-23.99).
| DLHCX | FSPHX | DLHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.62 | 316% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.62 | 324% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.070 | -11.527 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 708M | 5.78B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.45 | 423% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.00 | 0.76 | 1,711% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.56 | -10.88 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.27 | -23.99 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.66 | 37.35 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement