Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. DLHCX (759M). DLHCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: DLHCX (1.76) vs FSPHX (0.39). DLHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLHCX (17 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). DLHCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. DLHCX (4.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHCX: FSPHX (0) vs DLHCX (1000). DLHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.61 vs. FSPHX (6.37). DLHCX return over 5 years is better than : -7.70 vs. FSPHX (-15.45).
| DLHCX | FSPHX | DLHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.62 | 316% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.62 | 324% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.771 | 1.524 | 379% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 759M | 6.75B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 0.39 | 450% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.61 | 6.37 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.42 | 4.93 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.70 | -15.45 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.31 | 46.10 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement