Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. DLHCX (752M). DLHCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: DLHCX (1.82) vs FSPHX (0.41). DLHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLHCX (16 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). DLHCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. DLHCX (4.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHCX: FSPHX (0) vs DLHCX (1000). DLHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.99 vs. FSPHX (10.22). DLHCX return over 5 years is better than : -9.50 vs. FSPHX (-14.87).
| DLHCX | FSPHX | DLHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.62 | 316% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.62 | 324% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.110 | -1.326 | -385% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 752M | 6.37B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 0.41 | 439% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.99 | 10.22 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.78 | 0.21 | 4,754% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.50 | -14.87 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.85 | 41.70 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement