Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. DLHCX (803M). DLHCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: DLHCX (1.83) vs FSPHX (0.42). DLHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLHCX (17 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). DLHCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. DLHCX (4.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHCX: FSPHX (0) vs DLHCX (1000). DLHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.46 vs. FSPHX (14.59). DLHCX return over 5 years is better than : -2.97 vs. FSPHX (-10.56).
| DLHCX | FSPHX | DLHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.62 | 316% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.62 | 324% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.894 | 5.675 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 803M | 6.3B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 0.42 | 439% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.46 | 14.59 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.79 | 10.34 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.97 | -10.56 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.25 | 46.08 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement