DLN
Price
$100.73
Change
+$0.40 (+0.40%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
6.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VYM
Price
$164.97
Change
+$0.97 (+0.59%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
99.19B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DLN vs VYM

DLN vs VYM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) vs. Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM)

Key Takeaways

  • WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) uses a fundamentally weighted index that emphasizes companies based on their total dividend payments, resulting in approximately 300 holdings and a 0.28% expense ratio.
  • Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) tracks a yield-focused index with roughly 600 holdings, a significantly lower 0.04% expense ratio, and explicit exclusion of real estate investment trusts (REITs).
  • Both ETFs target large-capitalization U.S. dividend-paying equities and exhibit substantial overlap in holdings, yet differ in weighting methodology and diversification breadth.
  • DLN offers marginally higher exposure to certain technology names in recent market cycles, while VYM maintains broader sector representation and lower cost structure.
  • Expense ratio differences create a structural advantage for VYM in long-term total return potential, particularly for cost-conscious investors seeking high-dividend exposure.
  • Both funds suit investors focused on income generation within large-cap value strategies, with positioning influenced by interest rate expectations and corporate earnings trends.

Introduction

Investors seeking dividend-oriented large-cap U.S. equity exposure often evaluate WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) as complementary yet distinct options. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not compete directly in every respect; instead, they represent alternative approaches to capturing high-dividend stocks within the same broad category. DLN applies fundamental weighting by dividend dollars, while VYM emphasizes yield ranking. This comparison highlights their structural differences, sector exposures, and relative positioning amid evolving macroeconomic conditions such as interest rate cycles and corporate payout trends.

WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) Overview

WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) seeks to track the WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index, a fundamentally weighted benchmark comprising the large-capitalization segment of the U.S. dividend-paying market. The fund holds approximately 300 securities and weights constituents according to the cash dividends they pay relative to the total dividends distributed by all index members. Top holdings typically include major financial, healthcare, and technology firms such as JPMorgan Chase, Microsoft, and Johnson & Johnson. Sector allocations feature meaningful exposure to financial services, healthcare, and industrials. DLN maintains a 0.28% expense ratio and operates as a passive, physically replicated ETF with monthly dividend distributions. Its distinguishing feature lies in the dividend-dollar weighting scheme, which prioritizes companies contributing the largest absolute dividend amounts.

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) Overview

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which selects U.S. common stocks forecasted to deliver above-average dividend yields while excluding REITs. The ETF holds approximately 600 securities and employs a market-capitalization weighting approach within its eligible universe. Prominent holdings often encompass Broadcom, JPMorgan Chase, and Exxon Mobil. Sector exposures span financial services, technology, and healthcare with broad diversification. VYM carries a 0.04% expense ratio and follows a passive, full-replication strategy with quarterly distributions. Its core distinction is the focus on high-yield securities combined with buffer rules during annual rebalancing to limit turnover.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The large-cap dividend equity segment operates within a broader environment shaped by monetary policy expectations, corporate earnings growth, and capital allocation trends. Dividend-focused strategies attract flows during periods of economic stability when companies sustain or increase payouts. Regulatory developments around taxation of qualified dividends and interest rate movements influence relative attractiveness versus growth-oriented equities. Macro drivers include inflation moderation, labor market conditions, and geopolitical factors affecting energy and financial sectors. Risks encompass potential payout reductions during earnings downturns and valuation compression if growth prospects weaken across holdings.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have delivered returns closely aligned with large-cap value benchmarks, with performance tied to sector rotation favoring financials and energy during certain periods and technology during others. DLN's dividend-weighted approach has occasionally produced slightly different volatility characteristics compared with VYM's yield-screened portfolio. VYM's larger number of holdings and lower expense ratio have supported competitive positioning over multi-month horizons, particularly when interest rate expectations stabilize. Relative performance has reflected differences in top holdings and sector tilts, with both funds demonstrating resilience across earnings seasons and macroeconomic shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on dividend ETFs and related holdings may find the platform useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) with moderate probability. The ETF’s substantially lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 600 holdings, and established liquidity profile provide advantages in cost efficiency and risk dispersion. These characteristics align with durable positioning in dividend strategies amid varying market conditions, though individual investor objectives should guide final allocation decisions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DLN vs. VYM commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLN is a StrongBuy and VYM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VYM has more net assets: 99.2B vs. DLN (6.36B). VYM (15.658) and DLN (15.509) have matching annual dividend yield . DLN was incepted earlier than VYM: DLN (20 years) vs VYM (20 years). VYM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than DLN (0.28). DLN has a higher turnover VYM (11.00) vs VYM (11.00).
DLNVYMDLN / VYM
Gain YTD15.50915.65899%
Net Assets6.36B99.2B6%
Total Expense Ratio0.280.04700%
Turnover17.0011.00155%
Yield1.752.2478%
Fund Existence20 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DLNVYM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VYM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAFE50.400.45
+0.90%
PIMCO RAFI ESG US ETF
AQEC26.040.15
+0.58%
AQE Core ETF
JGLO73.490.42
+0.57%
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF
INQQ13.980.04
+0.29%
INQQ The India Internet ETF
FRIZ27.73N/A
N/A
Franklin Dividend Growth ETF

DLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DLN has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DLN jumps, then CE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DLN
1D Price
Change %
DLN100%
+0.40%
CE - DLN
67%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
EMR - DLN
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
NDSN - DLN
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
SSNC - DLN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
UDR - DLN
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
More