It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DLNG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGLNG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DLNG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLNG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
DLNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while GLNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +2.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.75%.
DLNG is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.
GLNG is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
DLNG | GLNG | DLNG / GLNG | |
Capitalization | 106M | 2.52B | 4% |
EBITDA | 108M | 142M | 76% |
Gain YTD | -30.428 | 0.549 | -5,538% |
P/E Ratio | 4.24 | 47.18 | 9% |
Revenue | 140M | 278M | 50% |
Total Cash | 52.9M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 443M | 1.19B | 37% |
DLNG | GLNG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DLNG's Valuation (13) in the Marine Shipping industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLNG (99). This means that DLNG’s stock grew significantly faster than GLNG’s over the last 12 months.
GLNG's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as DLNG (41). This means that GLNG’s stock grew similarly to DLNG’s over the last 12 months.
DLNG's SMR Rating (75) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as GLNG (89). This means that DLNG’s stock grew similarly to GLNG’s over the last 12 months.
GLNG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as DLNG (58). This means that GLNG’s stock grew similarly to DLNG’s over the last 12 months.
GLNG's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Marine Shipping industry is significantly better than the same rating for DLNG (92). This means that GLNG’s stock grew significantly faster than DLNG’s over the last 12 months.
DLNG | GLNG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago76% | 16 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago61% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DLNG has been loosely correlated with GLNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DLNG jumps, then GLNG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DLNG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DLNG | 100% | +0.27% | ||
GLNG - DLNG | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
ET - DLNG | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
GEL - DLNG | 29% Poorly correlated | +5.81% | ||
VNOM - DLNG | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.84% | ||
LPG - DLNG | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLNG has been loosely correlated with ET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLNG jumps, then ET could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLNG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GLNG | 100% | +0.33% | ||
ET - GLNG | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
VNOM - GLNG | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
TRGP - GLNG | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.81% | ||
DTM - GLNG | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
WMB - GLNG | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More |