Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLQIX vs GFACX
DLQIX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts DLQIX vs GFACX
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity I
Price$16.57
Change+$0.07 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets169.28M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.34
Change+$0.45 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
DLQIX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLQIX vs. GFACX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLQIX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. DLQIX (169M). DLQIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: DLQIX (0.52) vs GFACX (0.00). DLQIX was incepted earlier than GFACX: DLQIX (28 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than DLQIX (0.83). DLQIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.80 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLQIX: GFACX (250) vs DLQIX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.55 vs. DLQIX (-9.03). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 28.67 vs. DLQIX (-31.31).
| DLQIX | GFACX | DLQIX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.36 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.36 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.368 | 15.025 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.03 | 13.55 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.48 | 47.95 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.31 | 28.67 | -109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.30 | 79.75 | 2% |