Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLQIX vs GFACX
DLQIX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts DLQIX vs GFACX
DLQIX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLQIX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLQIX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. DLQIX (133M). DLQIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: DLQIX (0.51) vs GFACX (0.00). DLQIX was incepted earlier than GFACX: DLQIX (29 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than DLQIX (0.88). DLQIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.87 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLQIX: GFACX (250) vs DLQIX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. DLQIX (-6.53). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 3.85 vs. DLQIX (-48.84).
| DLQIX | GFACX | DLQIX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.35 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.35 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.540 | 8.529 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.53 | -2.39 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.81 | 34.46 | -69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -48.84 | 3.85 | -1,267% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.31 | 82.33 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement