Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLRHX vs FSPHX
DLRHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLRHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLRHX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. DLRHX (648M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than DLRHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs DLRHX (0.00). DLRHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLRHX (15 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). DLRHX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. DLRHX (5.00). DLRHX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.92 vs. DLRHX (-17.08). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.37 vs. DLRHX (-16.63).
| DLRHX | FSPHX | DLRHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.63 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.63 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.822 | -6.312 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 648M | 5.86B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.08 | -11.92 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.03 | -1.30 | 927% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.63 | -13.37 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.21 | 7.03 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers