Ad is loading...
DLRHX vs FSPHX
DLRHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLRHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLRHX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.74B vs. DLRHX (736M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than DLRHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs DLRHX (0.00). DLRHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLRHX (15 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). DLRHX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. DLRHX (5.00). DLRHX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DLRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.17 vs. FSPHX (-9.89). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : 7.38 vs. DLRHX (6.62).
| DLRHX | FSPHX | DLRHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.65 | 225% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.65 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.950 | 0.844 | 586% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 736M | 6.74B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.17 | -9.89 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.43 | 0.86 | -514% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.62 | 7.38 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.71 | 14.97 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers