Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLRHX vs FSPHX
DLRHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLRHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLRHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. DLRHX (627M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than DLRHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs DLRHX (0.00). DLRHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLRHX (16 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). DLRHX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. DLRHX (5.00). DLRHX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.17 vs. DLRHX (-20.80). FSPHX (-17.05) and DLRHX (-17.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DLRHX | FSPHX | DLRHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.63 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.63 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.257 | -6.532 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 627M | 5.74B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.80 | -15.17 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.52 | -6.93 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.31 | -17.05 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.64 | 4.85 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement