Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLRHX vs FSPHX
DLRHX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts DLRHX vs FSPHX
DLRHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLRHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLRHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. DLRHX (757M). DLRHX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: DLRHX (2.12) vs FSPHX (0.39). DLRHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLRHX (17 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). DLRHX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. DLRHX (4.00). DLRHX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DLRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.14 vs. FSPHX (11.06). DLRHX return over 5 years is better than : -1.08 vs. FSPHX (-14.64).
| DLRHX | FSPHX | DLRHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.62 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.62 | 244% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.790 | 3.036 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 757M | 6.75B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 0.39 | 542% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.14 | 11.06 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.31 | 8.02 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.08 | -14.64 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.38 | 45.50 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement