Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLRHX vs FSPHX
DLRHX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts DLRHX vs FSPHX
DLRHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLRHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLRHX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. DLRHX (708M). DLRHX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: DLRHX (2.32) vs FSPHX (0.45). DLRHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLRHX (16 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). DLRHX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. DLRHX (5.00). DLRHX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DLRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.21 vs. FSPHX (1.68). DLRHX return over 5 years is better than : -9.86 vs. FSPHX (-23.74).
| DLRHX | FSPHX | DLRHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.62 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.62 | 244% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.278 | -10.542 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 708M | 5.78B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 0.45 | 511% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.21 | 1.68 | 966% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.24 | -9.89 | -63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.86 | -23.74 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.10 | 38.87 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement