DLS | ISVL | DLS / ISVL | |
Gain YTD | 26.062 | 28.567 | 91% |
Net Assets | 1.01B | 38.7M | 2,610% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.30 | 193% |
Turnover | 41.00 | 63.00 | 65% |
Yield | 3.97 | 3.36 | 118% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 4 years | - |
DLS | ISVL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago78% | 9 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DLS has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DLS jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISVL and CELC have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISVL and CELC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ISVL | 100% | +0.91% | ||
CELC - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
SRE - ISVL | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
MOVE - ISVL | 10% Poorly correlated | -4.53% | ||
TXG - ISVL | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
APAM - ISVL | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.16% | ||
More |