Ad is loading...
DMAGX vs FNWFX
DMAGX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DMAGX vs FNWFX
Driehaus Global Fund
Price$14.62
Change+$0.11 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.74M
American Funds New World F3
Price$75.98
Change+$0.48 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.57B
DMAGX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAGX vs. FNWFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAGX is a StrongBuy and FNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 59.6B vs. DMAGX (55.7M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than DMAGX: FNWFX (1.23) vs DMAGX (0.54). DMAGX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: DMAGX (8 years) vs FNWFX (8 years). DMAGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). DMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 179.00 vs. FNWFX (37.00). DMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: DMAGX (10000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.82 vs. DMAGX (-0.44). DMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.89 vs. FNWFX (33.74).
| DMAGX | FNWFX | DMAGX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.57 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.57 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.808 | -1.350 | 504% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.7M | 59.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.23 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.44 | 0.82 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.57 | 5.11 | 363% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.89 | 33.74 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers