Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAGX vs FNWFX
DMAGX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DMAGX vs FNWFX
Driehaus Global Fund
Price$17.94
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.49M
American Funds New World F3
Price$90.27
Change-$0.41 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
DMAGX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAGX vs. FNWFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAGX is a Buy and FNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. DMAGX (70.5M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than DMAGX: FNWFX (1.09) vs DMAGX (0.47). DMAGX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: DMAGX (8 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). DMAGX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). DMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FNWFX (37.00). DMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: DMAGX (10000) vs FNWFX (1000000). DMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.02 vs. FNWFX (16.25). DMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 48.77 vs. FNWFX (30.41).
| DMAGX | FNWFX | DMAGX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.57 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.57 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.222 | 17.203 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.5M | 70.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.09 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.02 | 16.25 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.99 | 40.79 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.77 | 30.41 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement