Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAGX vs FNWFX
DMAGX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DMAGX vs FNWFX
Driehaus Global Fund
Price$19.09
Change-$0.13 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.83M
American Funds New World F3
Price$96.06
Change-$0.30 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
DMAGX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAGX vs. FNWFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAGX is a Buy and FNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. DMAGX (77.8M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than DMAGX: FNWFX (1.02) vs DMAGX (0.43). DMAGX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: DMAGX (9 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). DMAGX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). DMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FNWFX (37.00). DMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: DMAGX (10000) vs FNWFX (1000000). DMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.39 vs. FNWFX (12.85). DMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 50.03 vs. FNWFX (31.02).
| DMAGX | FNWFX | DMAGX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.57 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.57 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.443 | 24.721 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77.8M | 75.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.02 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.39 | 12.85 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.27 | 58.08 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.03 | 31.02 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement