Ad is loading...
DMAGX vs FNWFX
DMAGX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DMAGX vs FNWFX
Driehaus Global Fund
Price$15.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.16M
American Funds New World F3
Price$81.74
Change+$0.22 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
DMAGX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAGX vs. FNWFX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAGX is a Buy and FNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. DMAGX (60.2M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than DMAGX: FNWFX (1.21) vs DMAGX (0.53). DMAGX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: DMAGX (8 years) vs FNWFX (8 years). DMAGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). DMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FNWFX (37.00). DMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: DMAGX (10000) vs FNWFX (1000000). DMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.04 vs. FNWFX (3.79). DMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 54.27 vs. FNWFX (38.68).
| DMAGX | FNWFX | DMAGX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.57 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.57 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.578 | 6.128 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 60.2M | 63.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.21 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.04 | 3.79 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.81 | 26.93 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.27 | 38.68 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers