Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAGX vs FNWFX
DMAGX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DMAGX vs FNWFX
DMAGX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAGX vs. FNWFX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAGX is a Buy and FNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. DMAGX (88.5M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than DMAGX: FNWFX (1.27) vs DMAGX (0.65). DMAGX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: DMAGX (9 years) vs FNWFX (10 years). DMAGX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). DMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). DMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: DMAGX (10000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.21 vs. DMAGX (8.80). DMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 36.78 vs. FNWFX (18.46).
| DMAGX | FNWFX | DMAGX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.57 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.57 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.193 | 15.456 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.5M | 88.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.27 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.80 | 20.21 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.72 | 51.08 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.78 | 18.46 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement