Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMCFX vs FSMAX
DMCFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DMCFX vs FSMAX
DMCFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMCFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMCFX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. DMCFX (7.25B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DMCFX: FSMAX (0.50) vs DMCFX (0.00). DMCFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DMCFX (7 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DMCFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DMCFX: FSMAX (0) vs DMCFX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.22 vs. DMCFX (22.13). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.58 vs. DMCFX (8.34).
| DMCFX | FSMAX | DMCFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.04 | 2,114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.04 | 2,114% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.548 | 15.556 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.25B | 42.7B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.13 | 30.22 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.51 | 67.14 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.34 | 38.58 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 146.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers