Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMCFX vs FSMAX
DMCFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DMCFX vs FSMAX
DMCFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMCFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMCFX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. DMCFX (6.79B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DMCFX: FSMAX (0.50) vs DMCFX (0.00). DMCFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DMCFX (7 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DMCFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DMCFX: FSMAX (0) vs DMCFX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. DMCFX (10.98). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. DMCFX (-8.15).
| DMCFX | FSMAX | DMCFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.04 | 2,114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.04 | 2,114% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.494 | 16.937 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.79B | 40.1B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.98 | 23.68 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.13 | 72.74 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.15 | 40.14 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 134.49 | - |