Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMCVX vs FSMAX
DMCVX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DMCVX vs FSMAX
DMCVX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMCVX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMCVX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. DMCVX (403M). FSMAX (0.50) and DMCVX (0.50) have matching dividends . DMCVX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DMCVX (31 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DMCVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.98 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DMCVX: FSMAX (0) vs DMCVX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.69 vs. DMCVX (7.14). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.70 vs. DMCVX (-4.57).
| DMCVX | FSMAX | DMCVX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.04 | 3,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.04 | 3,314% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.667 | 20.115 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 403M | 40.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.50 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.14 | 25.69 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.40 | 73.94 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.57 | 40.70 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.06 | 143.59 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement