Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMCVX vs FSMDX
DMCVX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DMCVX vs FSMDX
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value A
Price$31.41
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets381.35M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.80
Change-$0.07 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.39B
DMCVX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMCVX vs. FSMDX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMCVX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. DMCVX (381M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DMCVX: FSMDX (1.29) vs DMCVX (0.36). DMCVX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DMCVX (30 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). DMCVX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.67 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DMCVX: FSMDX (0) vs DMCVX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.95 vs. DMCVX (1.35). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 65.88 vs. DMCVX (19.50).
| DMCVX | FSMDX | DMCVX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.03 | 4,680% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.03 | 4,680% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.431 | 6.476 | 53% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 381M | 43.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.29 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.35 | 15.95 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.45 | 35.68 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.50 | 65.88 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.00 | 123.76 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement