Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMCVX vs FSMDX
DMCVX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DMCVX vs FSMDX
DMCVX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMCVX vs. FSMDX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMCVX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. DMCVX (403M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DMCVX: FSMDX (0.76) vs DMCVX (0.50). DMCVX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DMCVX (31 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DMCVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.98 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DMCVX: FSMDX (0) vs DMCVX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.19 vs. DMCVX (7.14). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.48 vs. DMCVX (-4.57).
| DMCVX | FSMDX | DMCVX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.03 | 4,640% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.03 | 4,640% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.667 | 19.875 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 403M | 52.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.76 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.14 | 23.19 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.40 | 63.29 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.57 | 47.48 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.06 | 174.39 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement