DMPZF
Price
$2.79
Change
-$0.51 (-15.45%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.06B
KRUS
Price
$79.72
Change
-$3.41 (-4.10%)
Updated
Aug 8, 10:41 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.02B
89 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DMPZF vs KRUS

Header iconDMPZF vs KRUS Comparison
Open Charts DMPZF vs KRUSBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$2.79
Change-$0.51 (-15.45%)
Volume$6.18K
Capitalization1.06B
Kura Sushi USA
Price$79.72
Change-$3.41 (-4.10%)
Volume$595
Capitalization1.02B
DMPZF vs KRUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DMPZF vs. KRUS commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMPZF is a Hold and KRUS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (DMPZF: $2.79 vs. KRUS: $83.13)
Brand notoriety: DMPZF and KRUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DMPZF: 845% vs. KRUS: 81%
Market capitalization -- DMPZF: $1.06B vs. KRUS: $1.02B
DMPZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.06B. KRUS’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DMPZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKRUS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DMPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KRUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DMPZF and KRUS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DMPZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KRUS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DMPZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KRUS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DMPZF is a better buy in the short-term than KRUS.

Price Growth

DMPZF (@Restaurants) experienced а -15.45% price change this week, while KRUS (@Restaurants) price change was -5.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

KRUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.70% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DMPZF($1.06B) and KRUS($1.02B) have the same market capitalization . KRUS has higher P/E ratio than DMPZF: KRUS (292.35) vs DMPZF (10.60). KRUS YTD gains are higher at: -8.225 vs. DMPZF (-27.344). DMPZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 162M vs. KRUS (4.17M). KRUS has more cash in the bank: 60M vs. DMPZF (25.9M). KRUS has less debt than DMPZF: KRUS (166M) vs DMPZF (536M). DMPZF has higher revenues than KRUS: DMPZF (674M) vs KRUS (269M).
DMPZFKRUSDMPZF / KRUS
Capitalization1.06B1.02B104%
EBITDA162M4.17M3,884%
Gain YTD-27.344-8.225332%
P/E Ratio10.60292.354%
Revenue674M269M251%
Total Cash25.9M60M43%
Total Debt536M166M323%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DMPZF vs KRUS: Fundamental Ratings
DMPZF
KRUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9256
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10046
SMR RATING
1..100
1192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DMPZF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRUS (99). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew significantly faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMPZF (100). This means that KRUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

DMPZF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRUS (92). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew significantly faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMPZF (89). This means that KRUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

DMPZF's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as KRUS (100). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DMPZFKRUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIDHX32.79N/A
N/A
MFS International New Discovery R3
PSGIX21.81N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Gr Instl
MFMPX17.38N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Next Gen Em Mkts A
SREQX13.17N/A
N/A
PGIM Select Real Estate R6
BMSDX14.47N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq C

DMPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMPZF and BDL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMPZF and BDL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMPZF
1D Price
Change %
DMPZF100%
N/A
BDL - DMPZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+8.94%
DPUKY - DMPZF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGY - DMPZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
CMPGF - DMPZF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRUS - DMPZF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More

KRUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRUS has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRUS jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRUS
1D Price
Change %
KRUS100%
-1.53%
CAKE - KRUS
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
RICK - KRUS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
SHAK - KRUS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
TXRH - KRUS
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
BJRI - KRUS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
More