DMPZF
Price
$3.33
Change
-$0.53 (-13.73%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.4B
KRUS
Price
$73.52
Change
-$7.50 (-9.26%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
887.1M
74 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DMPZF vs KRUS

Header iconDMPZF vs KRUS Comparison
Open Charts DMPZF vs KRUSBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$3.33
Change-$0.53 (-13.73%)
Volume$511
Capitalization1.4B
Kura Sushi USA
Price$73.52
Change-$7.50 (-9.26%)
Volume$262.59K
Capitalization887.1M
DMPZF vs KRUS Comparison Chart
Loading...
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DMPZF vs. KRUS commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMPZF is a Hold and KRUS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (DMPZF: $3.33 vs. KRUS: $73.52)
Brand notoriety: DMPZF and KRUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DMPZF: 95% vs. KRUS: 188%
Market capitalization -- DMPZF: $1.4B vs. KRUS: $887.1M
DMPZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.4B. KRUS’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $887.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $201.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DMPZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKRUS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DMPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KRUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DMPZF is a better buy in the long-term than KRUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KRUS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KRUS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

DMPZF (@Restaurants) experienced а -13.73% price change this week, while KRUS (@Restaurants) price change was -16.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +161.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

KRUS is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.49% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DMPZF($1.4B) has a higher market cap than KRUS($887M). KRUS has higher P/E ratio than DMPZF: KRUS (292.35) vs DMPZF (14.10). DMPZF YTD gains are higher at: -13.281 vs. KRUS (-18.834). DMPZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 162M vs. KRUS (3.2M). KRUS has more cash in the bank: 51M vs. DMPZF (25.9M). KRUS has less debt than DMPZF: KRUS (141M) vs DMPZF (536M). DMPZF has higher revenues than KRUS: DMPZF (674M) vs KRUS (238M).
DMPZFKRUSDMPZF / KRUS
Capitalization1.4B887M157%
EBITDA162M3.2M5,067%
Gain YTD-13.281-18.83471%
P/E Ratio14.10292.355%
Revenue674M238M283%
Total Cash25.9M51M51%
Total Debt536M141M380%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DMPZF: Fundamental Ratings
DMPZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DMPZFKRUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSZZX8.630.07
+0.82%
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable EM Eq Z
QCLVX31.800.09
+0.28%
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
JIGIX27.220.07
+0.26%
JHancock International Growth R4
IIGZX11.880.03
+0.25%
Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol Port I
IGREX8.68N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Real Estate R5

DMPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMPZF and BDL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMPZF and BDL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMPZF
1D Price
Change %
DMPZF100%
N/A
BDL - DMPZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
DPUKY - DMPZF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGY - DMPZF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
CMPGF - DMPZF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRUS - DMPZF
4%
Poorly correlated
-9.26%
More

KRUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRUS has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRUS jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRUS
1D Price
Change %
KRUS100%
-9.26%
FRSH - KRUS
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
TXRH - KRUS
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
CAKE - KRUS
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
PTLO - KRUS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
SG - KRUS
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
More