DIN
Price
$33.79
Change
-$1.17 (-3.35%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
427.75M
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KRUS
Price
$50.19
Change
+$0.05 (+0.10%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
609.19M
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs KRUS

DIN vs KRUS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. KRUS commentary
Aug 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and KRUS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 20, 2026
Stock price -- (DIN: $33.79 vs. KRUS: $50.19)
Brand notoriety: DIN and KRUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 95% vs. KRUS: 28%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $427.75M vs. KRUS: $609.19M
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $427.75M. KRUS’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $609.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $189.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKRUS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KRUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the long-term than KRUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KRUS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • KRUS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DIN and KRUS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а -7.35% price change this week, while KRUS (@Restaurants) price change was -4.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

KRUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.20% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KRUS($609M) has a higher market cap than DIN($428M). KRUS has higher P/E ratio than DIN: KRUS (292.35) vs DIN (54.50). DIN YTD gains are higher at: 6.443 vs. KRUS (-4.089). DIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 149M vs. KRUS (14.8M). KRUS has less debt than DIN: KRUS (208M) vs DIN (1.62B). DIN has higher revenues than KRUS: DIN (890M) vs KRUS (319M).
DINKRUSDIN / KRUS
Capitalization428M609M70%
EBITDA149M14.8M1,007%
Gain YTD6.443-4.089-158%
P/E Ratio54.50292.3519%
Revenue890M319M279%
Total CashN/A44.3M-
Total Debt1.62B208M777%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs KRUS: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
KRUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2513
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4462
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
299
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a48

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (16) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as DIN (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as KRUS (62) in the null industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRUS (99) in the null industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINKRUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KRUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBLCX43.030.01
+0.02%
American Funds Global Balanced C
HIBCX56.23N/A
N/A
Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS IB
TSCPX13.85N/A
N/A
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
MLPAX10.27N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha A
CUSEX41.50-0.03
-0.07%
Capital Group US Equity

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
-3.35%
FRSH - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
BLMN - DIN
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
DRI - DIN
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
RICK - DIN
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
FWRG - DIN
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.00%
More

KRUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRUS has been loosely correlated with FWRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRUS jumps, then FWRG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRUS
1D Price
Change %
KRUS100%
+0.10%
FWRG - KRUS
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.00%
FRSH - KRUS
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
DIN - KRUS
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.35%
BJRI - KRUS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
LOCO - KRUS
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
More