DIN
Price
$29.14
Change
-$1.72 (-5.57%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
368.89M
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KRUS
Price
$42.07
Change
-$2.28 (-5.14%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
510.78M
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs KRUS

DIN vs KRUS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. KRUS commentary
Sep 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Buy and KRUS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 10, 2026
Stock price -- (DIN: $29.14 vs. KRUS: $42.07)
Brand notoriety: DIN and KRUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 172% vs. KRUS: 86%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $368.89M vs. KRUS: $510.78M
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $368.89M. KRUS’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $510.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $179.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $9.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKRUS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KRUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the long-term than KRUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KRUS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KRUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the short-term than KRUS.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а -11.21% price change this week, while KRUS (@Restaurants) price change was -6.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -3.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

KRUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-3.28% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KRUS($511M) has a higher market cap than DIN($369M). KRUS has higher P/E ratio than DIN: KRUS (292.35) vs DIN (47.00). DIN YTD gains are higher at: -8.205 vs. KRUS (-19.606). DIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 142M vs. KRUS (14.8M). DIN has more cash in the bank: 97.5M vs. KRUS (44.3M). KRUS has less debt than DIN: KRUS (208M) vs DIN (1.69B). DIN has higher revenues than KRUS: DIN (900M) vs KRUS (319M).
DINKRUSDIN / KRUS
Capitalization369M511M72%
EBITDA142M14.8M959%
Gain YTD-8.205-19.60642%
P/E Ratio47.00292.3516%
Revenue900M319M282%
Total Cash97.5M44.3M220%
Total Debt1.69B208M812%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs KRUS: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
KRUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5915
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5775
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
299
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (11) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRUS (99) in the null industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as DIN (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as KRUS (75) in the null industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRUS (99) in the null industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINKRUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
DIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KRUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACAZX50.97N/A
N/A
Alger Capital Appreciation Z
GATRX65.98N/A
N/A
Gator Capital L/S Fd
JHQCX35.05N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity C
COSNX13.11N/A
N/A
Columbia Overseas Core Institutional
MOLGX10.25N/A
N/A
MoA Large Cap Growth Index Fund

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
-5.57%
FRSH - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
BLMN - DIN
49%
Loosely correlated
-5.64%
DRI - DIN
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
RICK - DIN
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
FWRG - DIN
45%
Loosely correlated
-8.22%
More

KRUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRUS has been loosely correlated with FWRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRUS jumps, then FWRG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRUS
1D Price
Change %
KRUS100%
-5.15%
FWRG - KRUS
45%
Loosely correlated
-8.22%
FRSH - KRUS
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
BJRI - KRUS
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
DIN - KRUS
37%
Loosely correlated
-5.57%
LOCO - KRUS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
More