Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMSFX vs GSRTX
DMSFX vs GSRTX Comparison
Open Charts DMSFX vs GSRTX
DMSFX vs GSRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMSFX vs. GSRTX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMSFX is a Hold and GSRTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSRTX has more cash in the bank: 6.27B vs. DMSFX (577M). DMSFX pays higher dividends than GSRTX: DMSFX (3.57) vs GSRTX (0.37). DMSFX was incepted earlier than GSRTX: DMSFX (9 years) vs GSRTX (18 years). DMSFX (1.69) is less costly to investors than GSRTX (0.91). GSRTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 134.00 vs. DMSFX (55.00). DMSFX (0) and GSRTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GSRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.72 vs. DMSFX (3.66). DMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.43 vs. GSRTX (16.29).
| DMSFX | GSRTX | DMSFX / GSRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.85 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.91 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.118 | 6.072 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 577M | 6.27B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 0.37 | 956% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.66 | 9.72 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.73 | 25.11 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.43 | 16.29 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.75 | - |