DNL | EFAD | DNL / EFAD | |
Gain YTD | 1.315 | -0.098 | -1,344% |
Net Assets | 566M | 65.5M | 864% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 67.00 | 27.00 | 248% |
Yield | 1.74 | 2.28 | 76% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
DNL | EFAD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago90% | 11 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago78% | 11 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago79% | 11 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago82% | 11 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago81% | 11 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago75% | 11 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago83% | 13 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago78% | 11 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNL has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DNL jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFAD and BNR have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFAD and BNR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EFAD | 100% | +0.37% | ||
BNR - EFAD | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
UCB - EFAD | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.78% | ||
ROG - EFAD | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
APA - EFAD | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.98% | ||
NEM - EFAD | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
More |