DNL | EFAD | DNL / EFAD | |
Gain YTD | 12.902 | 17.107 | 75% |
Net Assets | 493M | 70.6M | 698% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.50 | 84% |
Turnover | 62.00 | 36.00 | 172% |
Yield | 2.00 | 2.33 | 86% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
DNL | EFAD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago79% | 11 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNL has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DNL jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAD has been loosely correlated with LOGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFAD jumps, then LOGI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EFAD | 100% | +1.73% | ||
LOGI - EFAD | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
BNR - EFAD | 11% Poorly correlated | -9.97% | ||
UCB - EFAD | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
ROG - EFAD | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
APA - EFAD | 6% Poorly correlated | +4.27% | ||
More |