DNL | EFAD | DNL / EFAD | |
Gain YTD | 4.586 | 4.980 | 92% |
Net Assets | 539M | 64.9M | 831% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 67.00 | 27.00 | 248% |
Yield | 1.74 | 2.28 | 76% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
DNL | EFAD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 4 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago81% | 5 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago84% | 11 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago78% | 17 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNL has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DNL jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFAD and BNR have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFAD and BNR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EFAD | 100% | -0.17% | ||
BNR - EFAD | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
UCB - EFAD | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.09% | ||
ROG - EFAD | 7% Poorly correlated | -4.15% | ||
APA - EFAD | 6% Poorly correlated | -3.51% | ||
NEM - EFAD | 5% Poorly correlated | -5.74% | ||
More |