DNL | EFAD | DNL / EFAD | |
Gain YTD | -2.254 | 7.300 | -31% |
Net Assets | 450M | 65.8M | 684% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.50 | 84% |
Turnover | 66.00 | 36.00 | 183% |
Yield | 2.19 | 2.56 | 85% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
DNL | EFAD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago78% | 11 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNL has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DNL jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAD has been loosely correlated with LOGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFAD jumps, then LOGI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EFAD | 100% | +0.76% | ||
LOGI - EFAD | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
BNR - EFAD | 12% Poorly correlated | -3.45% | ||
UCB - EFAD | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
ROG - EFAD | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.33% | ||
APA - EFAD | 6% Poorly correlated | +4.81% | ||
More |