| DNL | EFAD | DNL / EFAD | |
| Gain YTD | 7.566 | 3.237 | 234% |
| Net Assets | 478M | 60.6M | 789% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.50 | 84% |
| Turnover | 76.00 | 40.00 | 190% |
| Yield | 1.29 | 2.64 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| DNL | EFAD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNL has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DNL jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFAD and BA have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFAD and BA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAD | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| BA - EFAD | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
| NEM - EFAD | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
| NG - EFAD | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| SAN - EFAD | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.50% | ||
| ROG - EFAD | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
More | ||||