| DNL | EFAD | DNL / EFAD | |
| Gain YTD | 9.970 | 6.017 | 166% |
| Net Assets | 484M | 62.8M | 771% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.50 | 84% |
| Turnover | 76.00 | 38.00 | 200% |
| Yield | 1.28 | 2.51 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| DNL | EFAD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 19 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNL has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DNL jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFAD and NEM have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFAD and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAD | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| NEM - EFAD | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| BA - EFAD | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.76% | ||
| NG - EFAD | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
| SAN - EFAD | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.26% | ||
| SAP - EFAD | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||