| DNL | EFAD | DNL / EFAD | |
| Gain YTD | 13.759 | 8.807 | 156% |
| Net Assets | 499M | 63.7M | 783% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.50 | 84% |
| Turnover | 76.00 | 40.00 | 190% |
| Yield | 1.32 | 2.58 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| DNL | EFAD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 14 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNL has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DNL jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFAD and CAR have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFAD and CAR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAD | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| CAR - EFAD | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.79% | ||
| BA - EFAD | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| NEM - EFAD | 10% Poorly correlated | +7.85% | ||
| APA - EFAD | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.56% | ||
| NG - EFAD | 9% Poorly correlated | +14.17% | ||
More | ||||