DNL
Price
$45.10
Change
-$0.72 (-1.57%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Net Assets
483.43M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IDHQ
Price
$42.99
Change
-$0.46 (-1.06%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Net Assets
919.81M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DNL vs IDHQ

DNL vs IDHQ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? WisdomTree Global ex-US Quality Growth Fund (DNL) vs. Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ)

Key Takeaways

  • DNL provides exposure to quality growth companies across both developed and emerging markets ex-U.S., while IDHQ focuses exclusively on developed markets ex-U.S., resulting in differing geographic risk profiles.
  • IDHQ maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.29% compared to DNL's 0.42%, offering a cost advantage for long-term investors seeking similar quality factor exposure.
  • Both ETFs emphasize high-quality companies with strong fundamentals, but DNL tilts toward growth characteristics and includes emerging market names such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, whereas IDHQ prioritizes developed-market stability with broader sector balance including financials.
  • DNL typically features higher concentration in technology and consumer discretionary sectors, while IDHQ shows more even distribution across industrials, technology, healthcare, and financial services.
  • Structural differences in index methodology—rules-based quality and growth scoring for DNL versus S&P quality metrics for IDHQ—lead to variations in holdings overlap and rebalancing frequency.
  • In recent market cycles, both have demonstrated resilience tied to international equity rotations, though IDHQ's developed-market focus may exhibit lower volatility during emerging-market stress periods.

Introduction

Investors seeking international equity exposure outside the United States often evaluate quality-focused strategies to navigate global market dynamics. The WisdomTree Global ex-US Quality Growth Fund (DNL) and the Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) represent two distinct approaches within the quality segment. While they do not compete directly due to geographic scope differences, both target similar investor goals of accessing high-quality companies with attractive growth or stability characteristics in non-U.S. markets. This comparison highlights their structural variances to assist in portfolio positioning decisions.

WisdomTree Global ex-US Quality Growth Fund (DNL) Overview

The WisdomTree Global ex-US Quality Growth Fund (DNL) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, a modified market-capitalization-weighted index of large- and mid-capitalization companies selected for quality and growth attributes. The fund holds approximately 200 to 300 securities spanning developed and emerging markets ex-U.S. Top holdings often include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, ASML Holding NV, and other leaders in technology and consumer sectors. Sector allocations typically emphasize information technology (around 35%), consumer discretionary (around 18%), industrials (around 16%), and healthcare (around 10%). It carries an expense ratio of 0.42% and employs a rules-based methodology with periodic rebalancing. Distinguishing features include its inclusion of emerging markets and focus on earnings growth alongside quality metrics.

Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) Overview

The Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the S&P Quality Developed ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. It provides exposure to approximately 200 high-quality large- and mid-cap companies in developed markets ex-U.S., selected based on profitability, earnings growth, and financial leverage criteria. Top holdings commonly feature ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding AG, and other established names. Sector allocations are more balanced, with significant weights in industrials (around 21%), technology (around 20%), healthcare (around 18%), and financial services (around 14%). The fund maintains an expense ratio of 0.29% and follows a transparent, rules-based index methodology with regular rebalancing. Its developed-markets-only mandate supports a focus on established economies.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the international equity quality factor space, influenced by global economic cycles, interest rate environments, and sector rotations. Key catalysts include corporate earnings trends among multinational firms, shifts in trade policies, and capital flows into developed versus emerging markets. Macroeconomic drivers such as inflation moderation and central bank policies affect valuations across regions. Risks encompass geopolitical tensions, currency fluctuations, and regulatory changes impacting cross-border investments. The quality theme appeals to investors seeking defensive characteristics amid uncertain global conditions, with ongoing interest in sustainable earnings and balance sheet strength.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both ETFs have reflected broader international equity movements tied to earnings seasons and macroeconomic data releases. DNL's emerging market component can amplify exposure to growth-oriented rotations in Asia and other regions, while IDHQ's developed-market emphasis often provides more stable responses during periods of global risk aversion. Relative positioning shows IDHQ benefiting from lower costs and diversified sector exposure, potentially supporting consistency across market cycles. Volatility differences arise from geographic breadth, with DNL exhibiting sensitivity to emerging-market developments and IDHQ aligning more closely with European and Japanese equity trends.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, balanced sector diversification, and developed-market focus that may reduce certain geographic risks, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to the Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and structural stability within the quality international equity space. This assessment draws from comparative cost structures and diversification profiles without constituting investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DNL vs. IDHQ commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNL is a Hold and IDHQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDHQ has more net assets: 920M vs. DNL (483M). IDHQ has a higher annual dividend yield than DNL: IDHQ (23.963) vs DNL (9.880). DNL was incepted earlier than IDHQ: DNL (20 years) vs IDHQ (19 years). IDHQ (0.29) has a lower expense ratio than DNL (0.42). DNL has a higher turnover IDHQ (41.00) vs IDHQ (41.00).
DNLIDHQDNL / IDHQ
Gain YTD9.88023.96341%
Net Assets483M920M53%
Total Expense Ratio0.420.29145%
Turnover76.0041.00185%
Yield1.292.0164%
Fund Existence20 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNLIDHQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IDHQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMVRX133.03N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Value R
HFMDX26.69N/A
N/A
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Inv
FCIKX18.58-0.07
-0.38%
NYLI PineStone International Eq Inv Cl
MECDX16.68-0.12
-0.71%
NYLI Epoch Capital Growth Class A
RAFGX46.59-0.54
-1.15%
American Funds AMCAP R-6

DNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNL has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DNL jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNL
1D Price
Change %
DNL100%
-1.57%
STM - DNL
75%
Closely correlated
-4.18%
BHP - DNL
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
OUT - DNL
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
RIO - DNL
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
SAP - DNL
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
More

IDHQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDHQ has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IDHQ jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDHQ
1D Price
Change %
IDHQ100%
-1.06%
STM - IDHQ
70%
Closely correlated
-4.18%
BHP - IDHQ
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
RIO - IDHQ
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
MT - IDHQ
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
CP - IDHQ
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
More