Ad is loading...
DNLAX vs IGNCX
DNLAX vs IGNCX Comparison
Open Charts DNLAX vs IGNCX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources A
Price$38.25
Change+$0.44 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
Macquarie Natural Resources C
Price$11.90
Change+$0.13 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.46M
DNLAX vs IGNCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNLAX vs. IGNCX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNLAX is a Buy and IGNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNLAX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. IGNCX (161M). IGNCX pays higher dividends than DNLAX: IGNCX (6.69) vs DNLAX (1.33). DNLAX was incepted earlier than IGNCX: DNLAX (22 years) vs IGNCX (28 years). IGNCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than DNLAX (1.16). DNLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.94 vs. IGNCX (37.00). DNLAX (1000) and IGNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. IGNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.05 vs. DNLAX (-24.52). DNLAX return over 5 years is better than : 73.15 vs. IGNCX (67.11).
| DNLAX | IGNCX | DNLAX / IGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 2.11 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 2.45 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.126 | 0.762 | -1,329% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 161M | 630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 6.69 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.52 | -8.05 | 305% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.16 | 0.32 | -8,154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.15 | 67.11 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.15 | -7.86 | -384% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...