Ad is loading...
DNLCX vs FSMDX
DNLCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DNLCX vs FSMDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap C
Price$45.17
Change+$0.34 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets409.02M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$30.83
Change+$0.26 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
DNLCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNLCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNLCX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. DNLCX (409M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DNLCX: FSMDX (1.20) vs DNLCX (0.00). DNLCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DNLCX (22 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). DNLCX (2.06) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DNLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.46 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNLCX: FSMDX (0) vs DNLCX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.53 vs. DNLCX (-8.40). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 70.65 vs. DNLCX (17.15).
| DNLCX | FSMDX | DNLCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.03 | 7,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 0.03 | 8,240% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.403 | -9.476 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 409M | 37.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.40 | 1.53 | -548% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.68 | 7.96 | -109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.15 | 70.65 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.95 | 83.80 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers