Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNLCX vs FSMDX
DNLCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DNLCX vs FSMDX
DNLCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNLCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNLCX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. DNLCX (509M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DNLCX: FSMDX (0.75) vs DNLCX (0.00). DNLCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DNLCX (24 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DNLCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DNLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.02 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNLCX: FSMDX (0) vs DNLCX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. DNLCX (-3.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. DNLCX (-12.90).
| DNLCX | FSMDX | DNLCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.03 | 7,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.03 | 8,680% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.336 | 13.837 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 509M | 53.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.75 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.67 | 13.26 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.56 | 56.18 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.90 | 40.31 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.70 | 167.00 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers