Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNLDX vs FSMDX
DNLDX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DNLDX vs FSMDX
DNLDX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNLDX vs. FSMDX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNLDX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. DNLDX (530M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DNLDX: FSMDX (0.76) vs DNLDX (0.46). DNLDX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DNLDX (42 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DNLDX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DNLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.02 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNLDX: FSMDX (0) vs DNLDX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.53 vs. DNLDX (6.86). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. DNLDX (0.54).
| DNLDX | FSMDX | DNLDX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.03 | 4,520% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.678 | 17.736 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 530M | 52.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.76 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 21.53 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.96 | 63.59 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.54 | 47.15 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.93 | 166.80 | 13% |