Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNLRX vs FSMAX
DNLRX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DNLRX vs FSMAX
DNLRX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNLRX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNLRX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. DNLRX (512M). DNLRX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: DNLRX (0.90) vs FSMAX (0.50). DNLRX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DNLRX (24 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DNLRX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DNLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.02 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNLRX: FSMAX (0) vs DNLRX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.22 vs. DNLRX (8.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.58 vs. DNLRX (2.28).
| DNLRX | FSMAX | DNLRX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.04 | 2,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.04 | 2,600% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.294 | 15.556 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 512M | 42.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.50 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.02 | 30.22 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.88 | 67.14 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.28 | 38.58 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.91 | 146.90 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement