Ad is loading...
DNLRX vs FSMDX
DNLRX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DNLRX vs FSMDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap I
Price$54.14
Change+$4.38 (+8.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.61M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$31.20
Change+$2.50 (+8.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
DNLRX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNLRX vs. FSMDX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNLRX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. DNLRX (385M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DNLRX: FSMDX (1.20) vs DNLRX (1.07). DNLRX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DNLRX (22 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). DNLRX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DNLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.46 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNLRX: FSMDX (0) vs DNLRX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.80 vs. DNLRX (-17.90). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 61.73 vs. DNLRX (20.50).
| DNLRX | FSMDX | DNLRX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.03 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.03 | 3,800% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.411 | -15.013 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 385M | 37.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.20 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.90 | -9.80 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.82 | 0.43 | -2,717% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.50 | 61.73 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.17 | 71.81 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers