Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNLRX vs FSMDX
DNLRX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DNLRX vs FSMDX
DNLRX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNLRX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNLRX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. DNLRX (514M). DNLRX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: DNLRX (0.87) vs FSMDX (0.76). DNLRX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DNLRX (24 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DNLRX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DNLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.02 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNLRX: FSMDX (0) vs DNLRX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.68 vs. DNLRX (4.14). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.30 vs. DNLRX (-1.07).
| DNLRX | FSMDX | DNLRX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.03 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.03 | 3,640% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.730 | 14.947 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 514M | 53.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.76 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.14 | 18.68 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.77 | 53.14 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.07 | 43.30 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.55 | 166.09 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement