Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNLRX vs FSMDX
DNLRX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DNLRX vs FSMDX
DNLRX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNLRX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNLRX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. DNLRX (509M). DNLRX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: DNLRX (0.86) vs FSMDX (0.75). DNLRX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DNLRX (24 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DNLRX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DNLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.02 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNLRX: FSMDX (0) vs DNLRX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. DNLRX (0.91). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. DNLRX (-1.74).
| DNLRX | FSMDX | DNLRX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.03 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.03 | 3,640% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.396 | 13.837 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 509M | 53.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.75 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.91 | 13.26 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.67 | 56.18 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.74 | 40.31 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.26 | 167.00 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers