Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSMX vs WCMNX
DNSMX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts DNSMX vs WCMNX
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$24.05
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.41
Change+$0.06 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
DNSMX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSMX vs. WCMNX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSMX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. WCMNX (44.8M). DNSMX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: DNSMX (1.27) vs WCMNX (0.00). DNSMX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: DNSMX (8 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than DNSMX (0.70). DNSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSMX: WCMNX (1000) vs DNSMX (500000). DNSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.83 vs. WCMNX (3.33). DNSMX return over 5 years is better than : 26.68 vs. WCMNX (15.09).
| DNSMX | WCMNX | DNSMX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.24 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.04 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.780 | 5.201 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 44.8M | 2,292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.83 | 3.33 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.58 | 19.73 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.68 | 15.09 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement