Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSMX vs WCMNX
DNSMX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts DNSMX vs WCMNX
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$21.45
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets983.59M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.02
Change-$0.05 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.48M
DNSMX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSMX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSMX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSMX has more cash in the bank: 984M vs. WCMNX (41.5M). DNSMX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: DNSMX (1.40) vs WCMNX (0.00). DNSMX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: DNSMX (8 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than DNSMX (0.70). DNSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSMX: WCMNX (1000) vs DNSMX (500000). DNSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.92 vs. WCMNX (-2.35). DNSMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.45 vs. WCMNX (22.04).
| DNSMX | WCMNX | DNSMX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.24 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.04 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.255 | -4.886 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 984M | 41.5M | 2,371% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.92 | -2.35 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.42 | 25.73 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.45 | 22.04 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers