Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSMX vs WCMNX
DNSMX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts DNSMX vs WCMNX
DNSMX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSMX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSMX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. WCMNX (49.8M). DNSMX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: DNSMX (0.39) vs WCMNX (0.00). DNSMX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: DNSMX (9 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than DNSMX (0.69). DNSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 152.00 vs. WCMNX (89.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSMX: WCMNX (1000) vs DNSMX (500000). DNSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.30 vs. WCMNX (9.79). DNSMX return over 5 years is better than : 9.15 vs. WCMNX (-8.37).
| DNSMX | WCMNX | DNSMX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.24 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.04 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.866 | 6.716 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 49.8M | 3,151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.30 | 9.79 | 289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.85 | 21.92 | 314% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.15 | -8.37 | -109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers