Advertisement
DOGZ vs PLBY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DOGZ is a Buy and PLBY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DOGZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLBY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- DOGZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PLBY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DOGZ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DOGZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
- PLBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DOGZ (@Recreational Products) experienced а -5.34% price change this week, while PLBY (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.95%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
PLBY is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Recreational Products (-2.59% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
@Apparel/Footwear (-1.85% weekly)Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
| DOGZ | PLBY | DOGZ / PLBY | |
| Capitalization | 17.2M | 140M | 12% |
| EBITDA | -4.06M | 16.5M | -25% |
| Gain YTD | -90.802 | -37.766 | 240% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 58.50 | - |
| Revenue | 13.9M | 125M | 11% |
| Total Cash | 16.6M | 31.9M | 52% |
| Total Debt | 18.7M | 177M | 11% |
DOGZ | PLBY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DOGZ's Valuation (29) in the Consumer Sundries industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLBY (84) in the null industry. This means that DOGZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLBY’s over the last 12 months.
DOGZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Consumer Sundries industry is in the same range as PLBY (100) in the null industry. This means that DOGZ’s stock grew similarly to PLBY’s over the last 12 months.
PLBY's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as DOGZ (94) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that PLBY’s stock grew similarly to DOGZ’s over the last 12 months.
PLBY's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as DOGZ (65) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that PLBY’s stock grew similarly to DOGZ’s over the last 12 months.
PLBY's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DOGZ (100) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that PLBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DOGZ’s over the last 12 months.
| DOGZ | PLBY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 18 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
Advertisement
DOGZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DOGZ and ONEW have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DOGZ and ONEW's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DOGZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOGZ | 100% | -2.50% | ||
| ONEW - DOGZ | 23% Poorly correlated | +7.35% | ||
| JOUT - DOGZ | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
| HWH - DOGZ | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| PLBY - DOGZ | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
| OSW - DOGZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
More | ||||
PLBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PLBY and UAA have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLBY and UAA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLBY | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| UAA - PLBY | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
| JRSH - PLBY | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
| HAS - PLBY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| CALY - PLBY | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| JAKK - PLBY | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||