The Aroon Indicator for DOUG entered a downward trend on October 16, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 283 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 251 of the 283 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 89%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 09, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on DOUG as a result. In 63 of 80 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where DOUG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where DOUG's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 22 of 33 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for DOUG just turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where DOUG's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 42 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Following a +4.00% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where DOUG advanced for three days, in 175 of 235 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
DOUG may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 9 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.833) is normal, around the industry mean (3.309). P/E Ratio (5.276) is within average values for comparable stocks, (118.735). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.034) settles around the average of (0.022) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.145) is also within normal values, averaging (5.676).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 53 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 78 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. DOUG’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. DOUG’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where FTHM declined for three days, in 333 of 362 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for FTHM turned negative on September 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 39 of the 47 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 83%.
The Aroon Indicator for FTHM entered a downward trend on October 14, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 12 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 12 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +6.38% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FTHM advanced for three days, in 212 of 251 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
FTHM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 65 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.770) is normal, around the industry mean (3.309). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (118.735). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.022) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.041) is also within normal values, averaging (5.676).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. FTHM’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FTHM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
FTHM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DOUG | FTHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 74% | 26 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DOUG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while FTHM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DOUG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTHM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
DOUG (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -4.52% price change this week, while FTHM (@Real Estate Development) price change was -11.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.40%.
DOUG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
FTHM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FXY | 58.00 | 0.07 | +0.12% |
| Invesco Currencyshares Japanese Yen Trust (FXY) | |||
| YSEP | 28.28 | -0.06 | -0.21% |
| FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) | |||
| ACYN | 20.69 | -0.07 | -0.34% |
| FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF | |||
| TPFG | 24.61 | -0.61 | -2.43% |
| Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (TPFG) | |||
| LTL | 23.45 | -0.94 | -3.85% |
| ProShares Ultra Communication Services (LTL) | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHM and AGNT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHM and AGNT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHM | 100% | -4.87% | ||
| AGNT - FTHM | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.05% | ||
| DOUG - FTHM | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
| AIRE - FTHM | 23% Poorly correlated | -7.09% | ||
| OPEN - FTHM | 23% Poorly correlated | -8.84% | ||
| REAX - FTHM | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||