It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DOX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEEFT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DOX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EEFT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
DOX (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.58% price change this week, while EEFT (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.30%.
DOX is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
EEFT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
DOX | EEFT | DOX / EEFT | |
Capitalization | 10.5B | 4.97B | 211% |
EBITDA | 874M | 589M | 148% |
Gain YTD | -3.105 | 1.912 | -162% |
P/E Ratio | 19.28 | 19.75 | 98% |
Revenue | 4.95B | 3.69B | 134% |
Total Cash | 601M | 1.78B | 34% |
Total Debt | 804M | 2.01B | 40% |
DOX | EEFT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 5 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DOX's Valuation (8) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EEFT (54) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that DOX’s stock grew somewhat faster than EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
DOX's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EEFT (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that DOX’s stock grew somewhat faster than EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's SMR Rating (37) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as DOX (58) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew similarly to DOX’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as DOX (59) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew similarly to DOX’s over the last 12 months.
DOX's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as EEFT (75) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that DOX’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
DOX | EEFT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago39% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago54% | 15 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago51% | 3 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago59% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NUSA | 23.00 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year US Aggt Bd ETF | |||
UJUN | 33.70 | N/A | +0.01% |
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jun | |||
VCSH | 78.22 | -0.04 | -0.05% |
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF | |||
LSGR | 38.49 | -0.08 | -0.20% |
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF | |||
REZ | 86.73 | -0.47 | -0.54% |
iShares Residential & Multisector RE ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DOX has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DOX jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DOX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DOX | 100% | +0.95% | ||
CPAY - DOX | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
PLUS - DOX | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
SSNC - DOX | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
EVCM - DOX | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
EEFT - DOX | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.43% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEFT has been loosely correlated with ALRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEFT jumps, then ALRM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EEFT | 100% | +2.43% | ||
ALRM - EEFT | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
CLSK - EEFT | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
SSNC - EEFT | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
BL - EEFT | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
UPBD - EEFT | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
More |