Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DOXGX vs MUBFX
DOXGX vs MUBFX Comparison
Open Charts DOXGX vs MUBFX
DOXGX vs MUBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DOXGX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. MUBFX (936M). MUBFX pays higher dividends than DOXGX: MUBFX (1.60) vs DOXGX (1.49). DOXGX was incepted earlier than MUBFX: DOXGX (3 years) vs MUBFX (54 years). MUBFX (0.77) is less costly to investors than DOXGX (0.46). MUBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. DOXGX (15.00). DOXGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MUBFX: DOXGX (2500) vs MUBFX (1000000). MUBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. DOXGX (5.40).
| DOXGX | MUBFX | DOXGX / MUBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.70 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.77 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 54 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.942 | 3.080 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 936M | 11,752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.60 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | 6.64 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.06 | 8.98 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -13.95 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -22.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TINY | 41.17 | 0.85 | +2.11% |
| ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | |||
| TY | 31.61 | 0.23 | +0.73% |
| TRI-Continental Corp | |||
| XDSQ | 37.01 | 0.23 | +0.63% |
| Innovator US Eq Acltd ETF™ Quarterly | |||
| STK | 29.12 | 0.16 | +0.55% |
| Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund | |||
| PICB | 23.52 | -0.10 | -0.42% |
| Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF | |||