DPST
Price
$141.75
Change
+$0.62 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Net Assets
440.64M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MLPR
Price
$71.45
Change
-$0.75 (-1.04%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Net Assets
57.29M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPST vs MLPR

DPST vs MLPR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) vs. ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR)

Key Takeaways

  • DPST delivers 3x daily leveraged exposure to the U.S. regional banking sector through the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index, while MLPR provides 1.5x quarterly leveraged exposure to midstream energy Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) via the Alerian MLP Index.
  • Both products employ leverage, amplifying volatility and compounding effects, but DPST targets financials with higher daily reset mechanics and MLPR focuses on energy infrastructure with quarterly payout features.
  • DPST maintains a diversified portfolio of approximately 140-160 regional bank holdings concentrated entirely in the financial sector, whereas MLPR, as an exchange-traded note (ETN), has no underlying holdings and relies on the credit of its issuer.
  • Expense structures differ significantly: DPST carries a 0.92% expense ratio, while MLPR incurs a 0.95% tracking fee plus variable financing costs that can result in higher effective costs.
  • Structural differences include DPST’s ETF format with daily rebalancing versus MLPR’s ETN structure with quarterly coupon distributions tied to MLP cash flows.
  • Investors seeking leveraged regional bank exposure face interest-rate sensitivity and regulatory risks, while MLPR holders encounter energy commodity and MLP distribution variability.

Introduction

DPST and MLPR represent distinct leveraged strategies within different sectors, offering investors amplified exposure to regional banking and energy infrastructure, respectively. They do not compete directly but serve as alternative tools for those pursuing sector-specific leverage within broader financial or energy themes. This comparison highlights structural variances, risk profiles, and positioning to assist investors evaluating thematic or tactical allocations in the current market environment.

Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) Overview

DPST seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index. The fund is a leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) that employs derivatives to achieve its objective and resets leverage daily. It holds approximately 140-160 positions, with top holdings typically including regional banks such as Zions Bancorporation, Bank OZK, and Texas Capital Bancshares, among others, all within the financial sector. Sector allocation is 100% regional banks. The gross and net expense ratio stands at 0.92%. Distinguishing features include its high leverage multiple and focus on U.S. regional banking institutions sensitive to interest rates and economic conditions.

ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) Overview

MLPR is designed to provide 1.5 times leveraged long exposure to the compounded quarterly performance of the Alerian MLP Index, less financing costs and tracking fees. Structured as an exchange-traded note (ETN) issued by UBS, it has no underlying holdings and carries issuer credit risk. The strategy targets midstream energy Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) involved in transportation, storage, and processing. It features a 0.95% annual tracking fee plus variable financing fees linked to short-term rates, resulting in higher effective costs. A key feature is the potential for variable quarterly coupons tied to leveraged distributions from index constituents, though payments depend on MLP cash flows.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Regional banks and energy infrastructure MLPs operate in distinct macroeconomic environments. Regional banking faces ongoing interest rate expectations, regulatory scrutiny, and economic cycle sensitivity, with capital flows influenced by lending demand and deposit dynamics. Energy MLPs benefit from stable midstream cash flows tied to commodity volumes, though they remain exposed to energy price trends and infrastructure investment cycles. Regulatory developments in both sectors, including banking oversight and energy policy, along with broader capital allocation between financials and energy, shape investor positioning across market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, DPST has exhibited higher volatility due to its 3x daily leverage and concentration in interest-rate-sensitive regional banks, with performance closely tied to banking sector rotation and earnings trends. MLPR’s 1.5x quarterly leverage and exposure to MLP distributions have resulted in different risk dynamics, often influenced by energy infrastructure stability and commodity trends. Relative positioning reflects sector momentum, with DPST amplifying financial leverage effects and MLPR providing geared participation in energy midstream flows, leading to distinct responses to macroeconomic shifts such as rate changes or energy demand patterns.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorability to DPST due to its ETF structure, established liquidity profile, and diversified holdings within the regional banking theme, despite elevated leverage. MLPR’s ETN format and variable financing costs introduce additional considerations around issuer risk and effective expenses that may weigh on relative positioning in certain environments. This assessment remains probabilistic and focuses on durable characteristics rather than short-term signals.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DPST vs. MLPR commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPST is a Buy and MLPR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPST has more net assets: 441M vs. MLPR (57.3M). DPST has a higher annual dividend yield than MLPR: DPST (41.663) vs MLPR (29.331). DPST was incepted earlier than MLPR: DPST (11 years) vs MLPR (6 years).
DPSTMLPRDPST / MLPR
Gain YTD41.66329.331142%
Net Assets441M57.3M770%
Total Expense Ratio0.92N/A-
Turnover152.00N/A-
Yield1.559.0017%
Fund Existence11 years6 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPSTMLPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLPR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCPIX59.23N/A
N/A
DWS S&P 500 Index S
HBSGX27.49N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS IB
JACRX15.05N/A
N/A
Easterly Global Real Estate C
ANOHX29.58N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Growth G
MSHNX13.37N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence A