DPST
Price
$131.95
Change
+$5.24 (+4.14%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
440.12M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SSO
Price
$65.31
Change
-$1.89 (-2.81%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
7.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPST vs SSO

DPST vs SSO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) vs. ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO)

Key Takeaways

  • DPST seeks 3x daily returns of the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index, providing concentrated leveraged exposure exclusively to U.S. regional banks, while SSO targets 2x daily performance of the broad S&P 500 Index.
  • DPST holds approximately 140-150 regional bank stocks in a modified equal-weighted structure, resulting in 100% financial services sector allocation, whereas SSO maintains exposure to roughly 500 large- and mid-cap companies across multiple sectors.
  • Both ETFs employ daily-reset leverage through derivatives, making them suitable for short-term tactical use rather than long-term holding due to compounding effects and volatility decay.
  • DPST carries a higher expense ratio of 0.92% compared to SSO's 0.87%, reflecting the specialized nature of its regional bank focus versus SSO's broader market approach.
  • Investors seeking amplified exposure to interest-rate-sensitive regional banks may favor DPST's structure, while those targeting broad U.S. large-cap equity momentum typically consider SSO for diversified leveraged participation.
  • Structural differences in holdings concentration and sector specificity drive distinct risk profiles, with DPST exhibiting higher volatility tied to banking sector cycles and SSO reflecting overall market leverage dynamics.

Introduction

Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) represent distinct leveraged strategies that appeal to investors seeking amplified daily exposure within the U.S. equity market. They do not compete directly as substitutes but instead offer alternative approaches to leveraged participation: one focused on a narrow, cyclical sector and the other on broad large-cap benchmarks. This comparison highlights their structural characteristics to help investors evaluate positioning based on risk tolerance, sector views, and tactical objectives in the current environment.

Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) Overview

DPST is a leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index. The fund typically holds 140-150 securities, primarily regional banks drawn from the S&P Total Market Index and classified under the regional banks sub-industry according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). Holdings are modified equal-weighted, resulting in top positions each representing approximately 1.5% of assets. Sector allocation is 100% financial services. The gross and net expense ratio stands at 0.92%. As a daily-reset product using swaps and other derivatives, DPST resets leverage each trading day and is designed for short-term trading rather than buy-and-hold strategies.

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) Overview

SSO is a leveraged ETF seeking daily results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund provides exposure to approximately 500 large- and mid-cap U.S. companies through a combination of equity securities, futures, swaps, and other derivatives. Holdings mirror the broad market-capitalization-weighted composition of the S&P 500, with top positions such as major technology and consumer companies each accounting for roughly 5-6% of assets. Sector allocations typically feature significant weights in technology (around 39%), financial services (around 11%), and communication services. The net expense ratio is 0.87%. Like other daily leveraged products, SSO resets exposure daily and suits short-term tactical applications.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader U.S. equity market but respond to different drivers. Regional banks face sensitivity to interest rate expectations, regulatory changes, loan demand, and credit conditions, with capital flows often tied to economic cycles and monetary policy shifts. The S&P 500, by contrast, reflects aggregate performance across technology, healthcare, consumer, and industrial sectors, influenced by earnings growth, corporate profitability, and macroeconomic trends. Recent market cycles have highlighted divergences between sector-specific banking dynamics and broad equity momentum, underscoring the importance of thematic alignment when considering leveraged exposure.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, performance differentials have stemmed from sector rotation patterns and macroeconomic variables. DPST's concentrated regional bank focus has amplified movements tied to banking earnings cycles and interest rate sentiment, resulting in elevated volatility relative to broader benchmarks. SSO has tracked amplified S&P 500 movements, benefiting from diversified participation in large-cap trends while experiencing less sector-specific concentration risk. Relative positioning favors DPST for investors with targeted views on regional banking resilience and SSO for those seeking leveraged exposure aligned with overall market breadth and large-cap leadership.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF and equity research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to SSO. Its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across hundreds of holdings, and alignment with large-cap market momentum provide a comparatively balanced risk profile relative to DPST’s higher cost and concentrated regional bank exposure. Investors should weigh these characteristics against individual objectives and market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DPST vs. SSO commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPST is a Buy and SSO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSO has more net assets: 7.96B vs. DPST (440M). DPST has a higher annual dividend yield than SSO: DPST (31.869) vs SSO (16.274). DPST was incepted earlier than SSO: DPST (11 years) vs SSO (20 years). SSO (0.87) has a lower expense ratio than DPST (0.92). DPST has a higher turnover SSO (4.00) vs SSO (4.00).
DPSTSSODPST / SSO
Gain YTD31.86916.274196%
Net Assets440M7.96B6%
Total Expense Ratio0.920.87106%
Turnover152.004.003,800%
Yield1.860.61302%
Fund Existence11 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPSTSSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSCW29.950.08
+0.27%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF
VYLD29.490.02
+0.08%
Inverse Vix Short-Term Futures Etns Due March 22, 2045
FTSL44.99-0.01
-0.02%
First Trust Senior Loan ETF
LFAO163.70-0.58
-0.35%
LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF
TMFG30.48-0.45
-1.46%
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF

SSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSO has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSO jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSO
1D Price
Change %
SSO100%
-0.61%
MSFT - SSO
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.18%
AAPL - SSO
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
AMZN - SSO
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.75%
NVDA - SSO
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%