Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRAFX vs FWCGX
DRAFX vs FWCGX Comparison
Open Charts DRAFX vs FWCGX
DRAFX vs FWCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRAFX vs. FWCGX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRAFX is a Buy and FWCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCGX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. DRAFX (409M). DRAFX pays higher dividends than FWCGX: DRAFX (2.10) vs FWCGX (1.57). DRAFX was incepted earlier than FWCGX: DRAFX (2 years) vs FWCGX (6 years). DRAFX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FWCGX (0.46). DRAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FWCGX (44.00). DRAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCGX: DRAFX (0) vs FWCGX (250). DRAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.44 vs. FWCGX (15.84). FWCGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.62 vs. DRAFX (-2.42).
| DRAFX | FWCGX | DRAFX / FWCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.46 | 257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.46 | 311% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.228 | 15.949 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 409M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 1.57 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.44 | 15.84 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.42 | 51.09 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.42 | 35.62 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement