Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRCAX vs FCMAX
DRCAX vs FCMAX Comparison
Open Charts DRCAX vs FCMAX
DRCAX vs FCMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRCAX vs. FCMAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRCAX is a Hold and FCMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. DRCAX (488M). DRCAX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: DRCAX (3.02) vs FCMAX (2.79). DRCAX was incepted earlier than FCMAX: DRCAX (43 years) vs FCMAX (24 years). FCMAX (0.76) is less costly to investors than DRCAX (0.67). FCMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. DRCAX (12.39). FCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRCAX: FCMAX (0) vs DRCAX (1000). DRCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.97 vs. FCMAX (2.78). FCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.78 vs. DRCAX (-2.19).
| DRCAX | FCMAX | DRCAX / FCMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.76 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.76 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.021 | -1.105 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 488M | 1.84B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 2.79 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.97 | 2.78 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.04 | 9.72 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.19 | 0.78 | -282% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.44 | 13.73 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement