Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRMBX vs NMBAX
DRMBX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts DRMBX vs NMBAX
DRMBX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRMBX vs. NMBAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRMBX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 9.3B vs. DRMBX (1.73B). DRMBX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: DRMBX (3.53) vs NMBAX (3.27). DRMBX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: DRMBX (32 years) vs NMBAX (31 years). NMBAX (0.63) is less costly to investors than DRMBX (0.54). NMBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. DRMBX (19.60). DRMBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: DRMBX (1000) vs NMBAX (2500). DRMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.96 vs. NMBAX (-0.47). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.02 vs. DRMBX (0.87).
| DRMBX | NMBAX | DRMBX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.63 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.63 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.083 | -1.985 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 9.3B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 3.27 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.96 | -0.47 | -205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.80 | 8.73 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.87 | 1.02 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.31 | 13.71 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement