Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRMBX vs NMBAX
DRMBX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts DRMBX vs NMBAX
DRMBX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRMBX vs. NMBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRMBX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 9.5B vs. DRMBX (1.82B). DRMBX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: DRMBX (3.41) vs NMBAX (3.21). DRMBX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: DRMBX (32 years) vs NMBAX (31 years). NMBAX (0.64) is less costly to investors than DRMBX (0.54). NMBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. DRMBX (19.60). DRMBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: DRMBX (1000) vs NMBAX (2500). DRMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.03 vs. NMBAX (6.02). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.81 vs. DRMBX (4.41).
| DRMBX | NMBAX | DRMBX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.64 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.64 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.983 | 1.123 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 9.5B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.21 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.03 | 6.02 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.39 | 11.74 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.41 | 4.81 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.91 | 17.44 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement