Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRMCX vs FSMAX
DRMCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DRMCX vs FSMAX
DRMCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRMCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRMCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. DRMCX (517M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DRMCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs DRMCX (0.00). DRMCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DRMCX (47 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DRMCX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRMCX: FSMAX (0) vs DRMCX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.47 vs. DRMCX (4.27). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.19 vs. DRMCX (-3.94).
| DRMCX | FSMAX | DRMCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.04 | 2,171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.04 | 2,171% |
| Fund Existence | 47 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.405 | 15.556 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 517M | 42.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.27 | 30.47 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.23 | 74.03 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.94 | 35.19 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.60 | 153.75 | 56% |