DRS
Price
$44.72
Change
-$0.45 (-1.00%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
11.94B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LHX
Price
$288.40
Change
-$2.34 (-0.80%)
Updated
Aug 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.72B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DRS vs LHX

DRS vs LHX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Leonardo DRS (DRS) vs. L3Harris Technologies (LHX) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Leonardo DRS (DRS) has delivered a standout year-to-date return of over 41% in 2026, driven by a wave of high-profile defense contract wins and robust backlog growth.
  • L3Harris Technologies (LHX) offers a more diversified defense portfolio with approximately $21.9 billion in annual revenue and a $38.7 billion backlog, providing stability and a compelling 1.67% dividend yield.
  • DRS is a mid-cap growth story focused on advanced sensing, electric propulsion, and network computing, while LHX operates as a large-cap defense prime with broad exposure across communications, space, and missile systems.
  • LHX trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio of roughly 32.6 compared to DRS at approximately 45.0, reflecting different growth expectations and market positioning.
  • Both companies maintain strong book-to-bill ratios above 1.0x, signaling sustained demand for their defense technologies amid elevated global security spending.
  • Near-term earnings reports for both stocks are scheduled for late July 2026, making the coming weeks a potentially pivotal period for relative performance.

Introduction

Investors tracking the defense sector have seen a widening performance gap emerge among industry players in recent months. DRS (Leonardo DRS, Inc.) and LHX (L3Harris Technologies, Inc.) represent two distinct approaches to capitalizing on elevated global defense budgets — one as an agile mid-cap specialist and the other as a diversified large-cap prime contractor. This comparison examines how these two defense technology companies stack up across business models, recent performance, growth catalysts, and market sentiment. For traders and long-term investors alike, understanding the contrasts between a high-growth defense electronics pure-play and an established multi-domain defense integrator can help frame the risk-reward calculus in today's market environment.

DRS Overview and Recent Performance

Leonardo DRS, Inc. is a mid-cap defense technology company specializing in advanced sensing, network computing, force protection, and electric power and propulsion systems. With a market capitalization of approximately $12.8 billion, DRS occupies a focused niche within the broader defense industry, supplying critical subsystems and components to the U.S. military and allied nations. The company reported full-year 2025 revenue of $3.65 billion, representing 13% year-over-year growth, while net earnings surged 31% to $278 million. Its book-to-bill ratio of 1.2x for the year and a backlog of $8.7 billion underscore robust demand visibility.

In recent weeks, DRS shares have demonstrated notable upward momentum, climbing from the low $40s into the high $40s range and pushing year-to-date gains past 41%. This rally has been supported by a series of significant contract announcements. In February 2026, the company secured multiple awards under the Missile Defense Agency's SHIELD indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, which carries a program ceiling of $151 billion. In March, DRS was selected as one of thirteen companies for the Advanced Technology Support Program V (ATSP5), a contract vehicle with a potential value exceeding $25 billion over ten years. More recently, in July 2026, the company announced a blanket purchase agreement to supply over 50,000 Tenum Orbit thermal imaging cameras, reinforcing its position in the growing unmanned systems market. DRS also continues to benefit from its role in the U.S. Navy's Columbia-class submarine program, having received contracts valued at over $1 billion for integrated electric propulsion components.

LHX Overview and Recent Performance

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is a large-cap defense prime contractor with a market capitalization of approximately $55.9 billion and a diversified portfolio spanning communication systems, integrated mission systems, space and airborne systems, and Aerojet Rocketdyne propulsion. The company generated $21.87 billion in revenue for full-year 2025, reflecting 2.5% annual growth, while delivering diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $8.52 — an 8.2% increase from the prior year. LHX ended 2025 with a substantial contractual backlog of $38.7 billion and a notable improvement in free cash flow, which rose 78.4% year-over-year to $1.8 billion in the fourth quarter alone.

LHX shares experienced a strong 2025, posting a total return of approximately 42%, but momentum has moderated in 2026. The stock is up roughly 3% year-to-date as of late July 2026, trading near the $300 level after reaching a 52-week high above $379 earlier in the year. The stock has faced headwinds in recent months, with a 3-month decline of approximately 5%, though it has found support and posted a 4.5% gain over the past month. The company's diversified revenue base — including $4.8 billion in international sales, representing 22% of total 2025 revenue — provides a degree of insulation from any single-program risk. With four operating segments and a broad technology portfolio that includes satellite systems, tactical communications, electronic warfare, and solid rocket motors, LHX remains one of the most diversified defense contractors in the sector.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in comparing stocks like DRS and LHX, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed for real-time market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only the most effective and market-aligned strategies earn a place in this featured section. These bots span diverse trading styles — including swing trading, trend following, and momentum-based approaches — with varying timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker coverage. Some bots in the marketplace have demonstrated annualized returns notably above benchmark indices, while others prioritize consistency and risk management. Each bot operates with its own statistical profile, win-rate history, and strategy logic, giving users the ability to evaluate which approach best aligns with their objectives. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which automated strategies are actively navigating today's markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

From a business model perspective, the contrast between DRS and LHX is significant. DRS operates as a focused subsystem and component provider, meaning its growth is tied closely to specific high-priority defense programs such as the Columbia-class submarine and next-generation missile defense. This concentrated exposure can amplify upside when programs receive funding, but it also introduces program-specific risk. LHX, by contrast, functions as a full-spectrum prime contractor with a revenue base nearly six times larger than DRS, offering diversification across air, land, sea, space, and cyber domains — along with a sizable international footprint.

On valuation, LHX currently trades at a trailing P/E ratio (price-to-earnings ratio) of approximately 32.6, while DRS commands a higher multiple of approximately 45.0. This premium for DRS reflects the market's expectation of stronger near-term earnings growth, supported by its 13% revenue expansion in 2025 versus LHX's 2.5%. However, LHX counters with a more substantial dividend — yielding 1.67% compared to DRS's 0.75% — and a lower beta of 0.75 versus DRS's notably low 0.19, the latter reflecting DRS's relatively short public trading history since its 2022 listing.

Risk profiles also diverge. DRS faces concentration risk tied to U.S. Navy and missile defense budgets, and its recent removal from certain Russell growth indices has prompted some repositioning by growth-oriented funds. LHX carries integration risk from its ongoing evolution as a combined entity following the L3 and Harris merger and subsequent Aerojet Rocketdyne acquisition, along with exposure to potential shifts in space and satellite program priorities. Both companies, however, benefit from the broader tailwind of elevated global defense expenditure.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, contract momentum, and relative positioning in the current market environment, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely view DRS as the more probabilistically favorable candidate in the near term. The stock's sustained price momentum — reflected in its 41% year-to-date gain and 20% three-month advance — coupled with a series of high-ceiling contract awards across missile defense, naval propulsion, and advanced sensing, suggests a concentrated catalyst profile that trend-following algorithms tend to favor. That said, LHX would likely be viewed as the more stable, lower-volatility choice for risk-conscious positioning, given its diversified revenue base, stronger free cash flow generation, and higher dividend yield. In probabilistic terms, DRS may offer greater near-term upside potential tied to program execution, while LHX provides broader downside resilience. The AI verdict ultimately depends on the strategy time horizon: momentum-oriented models would lean toward DRS, while stability-weighted models would find LHX's breadth more compelling.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DRS vs. LHX commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRS is a StrongBuy and LHX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (DRS: $45.17 vs. LHX: $290.74)
Brand notoriety: DRS and LHX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DRS: 60% vs. LHX: 119%
Market capitalization -- DRS: $12.06B vs. LHX: $54.14B
DRS [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $12.06B. LHX’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $54.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $1.93T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $43.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DRS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLHX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DRS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LHX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DRS is a better buy in the long-term than LHX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DRS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LHX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DRS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • LHX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LHX is a better buy in the short-term than DRS.

Price Growth

DRS (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +1.23% price change this week, while LHX (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +1.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +3.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

DRS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

LHX is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+3.57% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LHX($53.7B) has a higher market cap than DRS($11.9B). DRS has higher P/E ratio than LHX: DRS (37.59) vs LHX (29.14). DRS YTD gains are higher at: 33.034 vs. LHX (-0.216). LHX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4B vs. DRS (491M). LHX has more cash in the bank: 1.52B vs. DRS (270M). DRS has less debt than LHX: DRS (267M) vs LHX (11B). LHX has higher revenues than DRS: LHX (22.9B) vs DRS (3.78B).
DRSLHXDRS / LHX
Capitalization11.9B53.7B22%
EBITDA491M4B12%
Gain YTD33.034-0.216-15,264%
P/E Ratio37.5929.14129%
Revenue3.78B22.9B17%
Total Cash270M1.52B18%
Total Debt267M11B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LHX: Fundamental Ratings
LHX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55
SMR RATING
1..100
74
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DRSLHX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DRS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LHX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTOS10.820.18
+1.69%
Custom Truck One Source
PRTA9.260.04
+0.43%
Prothena Corp
FTAIM27.46-0.13
-0.47%
FTAI Aviation Ltd
AIRG5.29-0.05
-0.94%
Airgain
TYL317.64-5.29
-1.64%
Tyler Technologies

DRS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DRS has been loosely correlated with KTOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DRS jumps, then KTOS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DRS
1D Price
Change %
DRS100%
+1.14%
KTOS - DRS
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
MRCY - DRS
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
ESLT - DRS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
LHX - DRS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
CW - DRS
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
More

LHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LHX has been loosely correlated with NOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LHX jumps, then NOC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LHX
1D Price
Change %
LHX100%
+1.65%
NOC - LHX
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
RTX - LHX
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
GD - LHX
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
LMT - LHX
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
KTOS - LHX
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
More