Advertisement
LHX vs LMT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? L3Harris Technologies (LHX) vs. Lockheed Martin (LMT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- L3Harris Technologies (LHX) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) are both major players in the aerospace and defense sector, benefiting from elevated global defense spending.
- Over the past 12 months, LMT delivered approximately +10% total return compared to LHX’s +7% to +8%, reflecting differences in scale and contract momentum.
- LMT maintains a significantly larger backlog of approximately $194 billion versus LHX’s roughly $27.5 billion in recent orders, supporting longer-term revenue visibility.
- LHX focuses on communications, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) systems, while LMT emphasizes large-scale platforms such as aircraft, missiles, and space systems.
- Valuation metrics show LMT trading at lower multiples (forward P/E around 22x) relative to LHX (near 31x), presenting a contrast in growth expectations versus value.
- Both stocks exhibit sensitivity to U.S. federal budget cycles and geopolitical developments, with recent market activity highlighting steady sector demand rather than sharp divergences.
Introduction
Investors and traders seeking exposure to the aerospace and defense industry often evaluate L3Harris Technologies (LHX) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) as complementary yet distinct opportunities within the same sector. Both companies supply critical technologies to the U.S. military and allied nations amid sustained increases in defense budgets. This comparison examines their business models, recent relative performance, and positioning to assist portfolio managers, sector-focused traders, and long-term investors in assessing trade-offs between scale, specialization, and valuation. The analysis draws on observable market data and company disclosures to highlight contrasts without projecting outcomes.
LHX Overview and Recent Performance
L3Harris Technologies (LHX) operates as a diversified aerospace and defense company specializing in mission-critical communications, ISR systems, and electronic warfare solutions. In recent market activity, the stock has shown measured gains amid broader sector support from defense appropriations. Performance has been influenced by contract awards in communications infrastructure and international sales, contributing to steady but not outsized momentum compared with larger peers. Sentiment reflects ongoing integration of prior acquisitions and focus on high-margin electronics segments, with investors monitoring execution on backlog conversion during periods of elevated procurement activity.
LMT Overview and Recent Performance
Lockheed Martin (LMT) is the largest defense contractor by revenue, producing fighter jets, missiles, helicopters, and space systems for domestic and international customers. Recent performance has benefited from a record backlog and consistent demand for platforms such as the F-35 program. Over the trailing twelve months, the shares have posted gains supported by multi-year contract visibility and production ramp-ups. Market sentiment has remained constructive due to the company’s scale and role in major programs, with price behavior reflecting stable cash flow generation and limited volatility relative to smaller defense names during recent weeks of sector rotation.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform’s most promising AI trading bots for current market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that trade thousands of different tickers, each employing distinct strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters. Only the strongest performers across technical and fundamental approaches earn placement in the trending section. The page currently highlights 25 best AI trending bots selected from a total of 351 available robots. These bots cover stocks, ETFs, and crypto with varying performance statistics, volatility tolerance, and asset focus. Readers interested in automated strategies may explore the curated list for additional context on market signals.
Head-to-Head Comparison
L3Harris Technologies (LHX) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) differ markedly in scale and business mix. LMT’s larger revenue base and multi-decade platform programs provide greater backlog stability, while LHX derives advantages from specialized electronics and quicker adaptation in communications and ISR niches. Recent momentum has favored LMT on absolute returns, yet LHX has historically demonstrated periods of outperformance tied to acquisition synergies. Risk factors include LMT’s higher exposure to fixed-price development contracts and LHX’s reliance on international orders subject to regulatory approvals. Sector exposure remains similar, though LMT’s diversification across air, land, sea, and space segments offers broader resilience. Market sentiment currently reflects preference for LMT’s earnings visibility versus LHX’s higher growth-multiple valuation.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, backlog scale, and relative positioning within the defense sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently lean toward Lockheed Martin (LMT). The company’s larger contract visibility and lower forward valuation multiples provide a probabilistic edge in stability during periods of sustained procurement demand, though outcomes remain subject to broader macroeconomic and budget variables.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
LHX and LMT are competitors in the defense contractors space, particularly regarding the intelligence systems, optics, and computer technologies that LHX specializes in. LMT has greater involvement in the manufacturing of aircraft, submarines, and weapons systems. LHX has planted itself in its niche in the defense sector where semiconductors and nanometers are more important than megatonnage. LHX is smaller than LMT by about 50%, with an enterprise value of $52B compared to LMT’s $109B. It’s a little shocking to see a dividend payout ratio over 50% from LHX, but it was most likely under pressure pay by investors who were seeing such generosity from LMT. Lockheed is simply big and strong enough to do that, as it secures more military contracts by value than any other company in the world. Both companies have significant staying power and growth potential. They also make and sell commercial products and systems related to aviation, navigation, weapons, and communications.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LHX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LHX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LHX’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LHX’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LMT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LHX (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +5.36% price change this week, while LMT (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +10.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
LHX is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
LMT is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (-0.18% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| LHX | LMT | LHX / LMT | |
| Capitalization | 55.8B | 131B | 43% |
| EBITDA | 3.85B | 8.47B | 45% |
| Gain YTD | 2.848 | 18.951 | 15% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.54 | 20.97 | 155% |
| Revenue | 22.5B | 75.1B | 30% |
| Total Cash | 590M | 1.89B | 31% |
| Total Debt | 11.4B | 20.7B | 55% |
LHX | LMT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LHX's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as LMT (63) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to LMT’s over the last 12 months.
LMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as LHX (47) in the null industry. This means that LMT’s stock grew similarly to LHX’s over the last 12 months.
LMT's SMR Rating (17) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LHX (76) in the null industry. This means that LMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LHX’s over the last 12 months.
LMT's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as LHX (60) in the null industry. This means that LMT’s stock grew similarly to LHX’s over the last 12 months.
LHX's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as LMT (60) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to LMT’s over the last 12 months.
| LHX | LMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 28% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 8 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 43% |
Advertisement
LHX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LHX has been loosely correlated with NOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LHX jumps, then NOC could also see price increases.
LMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMT has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMT jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.