This comparison examines L3Harris Technologies (LHX) and Lockheed Martin (LMT), two prominent players in the aerospace and defense industry. Both companies supply critical technologies to government clients, including satellites, missile systems, and communication equipment. The analysis focuses on recent performance, business models, and market positioning to assist institutional investors, portfolio managers, and active traders evaluating relative value within the sector. It highlights observable trends in contract activity, earnings momentum, and stock behavior over recent weeks without projecting future outcomes.
L3Harris Technologies provides integrated mission solutions in communications, sensors, and space systems for defense and intelligence applications. In recent market activity, the stock has responded positively to multiple contract awards, including a U.S. Space Force selection for advanced tracking satellites and additional orders from the U.S. Army and Missile Defense Agency. The company announced an increased quarterly dividend of $1.25 and raised its 2026 revenue guidance range to $23.0–23.5 billion. With Q2 2026 earnings scheduled for July 29, investor attention centers on execution of the backlog and margin trends amid broader defense sector dynamics.
Lockheed Martin develops and manufactures advanced aircraft, missiles, and space systems, serving as a primary contractor for the U.S. Department of Defense and allied nations. Recent performance reflects strong Q2 results, with revenue reaching $20.06 billion and earnings per share (EPS) of $7.94, both exceeding analyst expectations. The company raised its full-year EPS guidance and highlighted a record backlog of $230.4 billion, driven by demand for missile defense and related programs. The stock advanced notably following the earnings release, consistent with sustained interest in large-scale defense platforms.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current trends and risk parameters appear in this section. Available bots feature diverse statistics, including win rates, drawdown profiles, and return ranges that reflect different trading styles. This resource provides traders with transparent data on bot suitability for specific tickers. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed performance information.
LHX emphasizes specialized communications and sensor technologies, while LMT maintains a broader portfolio spanning manned aircraft, missiles, and integrated systems. Recent momentum favors LMT following its earnings beat and backlog expansion, whereas LHX has advanced on targeted contract announcements ahead of its earnings release. Both face exposure to defense budget cycles and geopolitical developments. LMT typically exhibits greater scale in revenue and backlog size, potentially offering more stability in large programs, while LHX may demonstrate agility in niche technology segments. Market sentiment for each remains linked to contract flow and sector-wide spending trends.
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, backlog scale, and relative positioning within the defense sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently lean toward Lockheed Martin (LMT). The company’s demonstrated ability to exceed expectations and expand its backlog provides a measurable edge in trend stability compared with L3Harris Technologies (LHX) at this juncture. This assessment reflects probabilistic weighting of available data rather than a definitive ranking.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LHX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LHX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
LHX (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +1.61% price change this week, while LMT (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +5.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +3.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.44%.
LHX is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
LMT is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| LHX | LMT | LHX / LMT | |
| Capitalization | 53.7B | 138B | 39% |
| EBITDA | 4B | 10.2B | 39% |
| Gain YTD | -0.216 | 26.928 | -1% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.14 | 22.05 | 132% |
| Revenue | 22.9B | 77B | 30% |
| Total Cash | 1.52B | 3.79B | 40% |
| Total Debt | 11B | 20.5B | 54% |
LHX | LMT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 74 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 7 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LHX's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as LMT (58) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to LMT’s over the last 12 months.
LMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as LHX (55) in the null industry. This means that LMT’s stock grew similarly to LHX’s over the last 12 months.
LMT's SMR Rating (14) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LHX (74) in the null industry. This means that LMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LHX’s over the last 12 months.
LMT's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as LHX (60) in the null industry. This means that LMT’s stock grew similarly to LHX’s over the last 12 months.
LHX's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LMT (58) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to LMT’s over the last 12 months.
| LHX | LMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 28% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 52% | 7 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 56% | 28 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LHX has been loosely correlated with NOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LHX jumps, then NOC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMT has been closely correlated with NOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LMT jumps, then NOC could also see price increases.