Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSMFX vs FSMAX
DSMFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DSMFX vs FSMAX
DSMFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSMFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSMFX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. DSMFX (707M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DSMFX: FSMAX (0.49) vs DSMFX (0.00). DSMFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DSMFX (9 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DSMFX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DSMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 124.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). DSMFX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. DSMFX (11.54). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. DSMFX (-5.80).
| DSMFX | FSMAX | DSMFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.04 | 3,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.04 | 3,457% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.116 | 13.370 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 707M | 40.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.54 | 13.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.99 | 63.92 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.80 | 32.77 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 133.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement