Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSMFX vs FSMDX
DSMFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DSMFX vs FSMDX
Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity I
Price$13.72
Change+$0.09 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.38M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.58
Change+$0.22 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
DSMFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSMFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSMFX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. DSMFX (657M). DSMFX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: DSMFX (1.50) vs FSMDX (1.31). DSMFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DSMFX (8 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). DSMFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DSMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). DSMFX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.20 vs. DSMFX (1.36). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.40 vs. DSMFX (23.85).
| DSMFX | FSMDX | DSMFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.03 | 4,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.03 | 4,600% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.007 | 8.584 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 657M | 42.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.31 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.36 | 15.20 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.97 | 46.45 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.85 | 75.40 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 128.19 | - |