Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSMFX vs FSMDX
DSMFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DSMFX vs FSMDX
DSMFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSMFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSMFX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. DSMFX (707M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DSMFX: FSMDX (0.75) vs DSMFX (0.00). DSMFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DSMFX (9 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DSMFX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DSMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 124.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). DSMFX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. DSMFX (11.54). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. DSMFX (-5.80).
| DSMFX | FSMDX | DSMFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.03 | 4,480% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.03 | 4,840% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.116 | 13.837 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 707M | 53.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.75 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.54 | 13.26 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.99 | 56.18 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.80 | 40.31 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 167.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers