Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSMFX vs FSMDX
DSMFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DSMFX vs FSMDX
DSMFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSMFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSMFX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. DSMFX (752M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DSMFX: FSMDX (0.99) vs DSMFX (0.00). DSMFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DSMFX (9 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DSMFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DSMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 124.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). DSMFX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DSMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.14 vs. FSMDX (22.60). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. DSMFX (0.55).
| DSMFX | FSMDX | DSMFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.03 | 4,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.03 | 4,600% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.013 | 14.027 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 752M | 51.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.99 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.14 | 22.60 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.35 | 60.71 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.55 | 43.56 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 179.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement