Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSMZX vs FSMAX
DSMZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DSMZX vs FSMAX
DSMZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSMZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSMZX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. DSMZX (707M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DSMZX: FSMAX (0.49) vs DSMZX (0.00). DSMZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DSMZX (8 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DSMZX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DSMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 124.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). DSMZX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. DSMZX (8.48). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. DSMZX (-17.36).
| DSMZX | FSMAX | DSMZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.04 | 2,771% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.04 | 3,029% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.142 | 13.370 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 707M | 40.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.48 | 13.05 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.40 | 63.92 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.36 | 32.77 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 133.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement