Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSMZX vs FSMDX
DSMZX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DSMZX vs FSMDX
DSMZX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSMZX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSMZX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. DSMZX (707M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DSMZX: FSMDX (0.75) vs DSMZX (0.00). DSMZX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DSMZX (8 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DSMZX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DSMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 124.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). DSMZX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. DSMZX (8.48). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. DSMZX (-17.36).
| DSMZX | FSMDX | DSMZX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.03 | 3,880% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.03 | 4,240% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.142 | 13.837 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 707M | 53.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.75 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.48 | 13.26 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.40 | 56.18 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.36 | 40.31 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 167.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement