Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTBRX vs FBKWX
DTBRX vs FBKWX Comparison
Open Charts DTBRX vs FBKWX
PGIM Total Return Bond R
Price$12.26
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.38B
Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Z
Price$9.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.12B
DTBRX vs FBKWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTBRX vs. FBKWX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTBRX is a Hold and FBKWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTBRX has more cash in the bank: 51.4B vs. FBKWX (40.1B). FBKWX pays higher dividends than DTBRX: FBKWX (4.51) vs DTBRX (4.08). DTBRX was incepted earlier than FBKWX: DTBRX (18 years) vs FBKWX (11 years). DTBRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FBKWX (0.39). FBKWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. DTBRX (113.00). DTBRX (0) and FBKWX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBKWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.91 vs. DTBRX (3.38). FBKWX return over 5 years is better than : 1.31 vs. DTBRX (-2.49).
| DTBRX | FBKWX | DTBRX / FBKWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.36 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.39 | 328% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.245 | 6.618 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.4B | 40.1B | 128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.08 | 4.51 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.38 | 3.91 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.87 | 15.55 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.49 | 1.31 | -190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.55 | 28.94 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement