Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTBRX vs GIBAX
DTBRX vs GIBAX Comparison
Open Charts DTBRX vs GIBAX
PGIM Total Return Bond R
Price$12.23
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.66B
Guggenheim Total Return Bond A
Price$24.14
Change-$0.06 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.65B
DTBRX vs GIBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTBRX vs. GIBAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTBRX is a Hold and GIBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTBRX has more cash in the bank: 51.7B vs. GIBAX (29.6B). GIBAX pays higher dividends than DTBRX: GIBAX (4.67) vs DTBRX (4.05). DTBRX was incepted earlier than GIBAX: DTBRX (18 years) vs GIBAX (14 years). DTBRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than GIBAX (0.88). DTBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. GIBAX (70.00). DTBRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GIBAX: DTBRX (0) vs GIBAX (2500). GIBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.52 vs. DTBRX (4.39). GIBAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.36 vs. DTBRX (-1.82).
| DTBRX | GIBAX | DTBRX / GIBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.84 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.88 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.255 | 7.067 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.7B | 29.6B | 175% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 4.67 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.39 | 5.52 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.81 | 20.09 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.82 | -1.36 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.26 | 28.23 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers